Too bad it is KVM only right now. Not that KVM is bad, it's just early. The have LXC coming "soon" and that will be really awesome. I want VDI on LXC so that we can do it faster and on top of Scale HC3.

M.B.A. Applications Decline at Harvard, Wharton, Other Elite Schools as Degree Loses Luster

@jblaze said in Latency with VDI in VMware View 7 environment: I'm new to VDIs so not entirely sure if I'm asking the right questions. The server is hosted externally by our MSP and they're trying to determine what the cause is. That it is external alone is almost certainly the problem. VDI can work remotely, but is often relatively painful. Also, be aware, while there is some extreme edge cases where you can do hosted VDI, this has traditionally not been allowed and unless your MSP has figured out some extremely new and rare licensing with Microsoft, those VDIs aren't legal.

The Scale partner solution that people are thinking of is Work Spot. And no, it does not automatically create the VMs it's more of an access layer.

@Tim_G said in Deployment Scenarios for the Dell PowerEdge VRTX: I'd certainly love one of these for a home lab. That's for sure! I can see the whole ROBO deployment scenario. Even in single/several use situations, like you mentioned... such as for specific critical high-performing services that won't outgrow it. Anywhere else, I'd feel stuck with it... what happens if you start to outgrow the resources? How scalable is it? That's what would determine it's worth for usage in place of regular 2u deployment servers. Maybe I'm just not a blade type person. It's really meant for contained scenarios where you know how big you will grow. For a normal SMB, the issue is growing into it, rather than outgrowing it.

That's that. You can use extremely limited (2) VMs for testing or development, nothing more. You VPS, no cloud computing. No multi-tenant. So that is why Apple has no VPS presence, it's not allowed. You can get PS, but not VPS.

Very cool, will have to toy around with this.

Yep, implemented the same, for a majority of our clients... it's quick n easy to deploy, and manage .. This, along with Thin-clients, has been a winning combo for us .. . works like a charm every time .. Going a bit off-topic - Earlier, this year , we were contacted by a vendor, pushing these really really dirt cheap China-made thin-clients (They go by the name Thnder-X) ... So, for $18 a pop (only if you buy a minimum of 50 Units), it offers : - Arm Cortex 1.8ghz CPU 1GB RAM 512MB on-board Flash 100/1000 Network Port 3 USB ports (2xUSB 2.0, 1x USB 3) 1 HDMI Port + 1 VGA Port support upto 1920x1080 / 32 bit colour depth / Dual Display Audio Port. 7.5W Power consumption Windows CE We were rather skeptical at first, so the vendor gave us a unit to demo ... We're using it on a daily basis for around a month.. Worked well for most basic office tasks (Documents, Spreadsheets, Emails, Browsing, Accounting etc) ... Videos didn't do too well, but still, not as bad as we were expecting .. The only catch is that it comes with a 6 month replacement warranty... We bought around 10 units, and gifted 4 to a client ... at $18/unit, I don't mind gifting these to 20 MangoLassi users ... you pay for your own shipping ... hehehe Anyway, the client has been using these in a production environment (on the above setup), for over 6 months, and they've been pretty happy with it, so far ..

@scottalanmiller said in Has Anyone Played with KVM-VDI?: @Seitan said in Has Anyone Played with KVM-VDI?: @dafyre yes, you can create regular machines - they are called "simple machines". But still KVM-VDI is more vdi oriented. Since the KVM market lacks a good, solid, standard GUI management option like XenServer has in XenOrchestra, that might be a spot that KVM-VDI makes more sense than you might think at first glance. That is why I was asking. I've got WebVirtmgr on my hosted system and it's... okay. It does the job, at least.

@davedemlow said in Hyperconvergence & VDI: @dafyre currently we do not ... but as above, things can change based on customer demand, technology changes, etc. Awe man. What if we want to run CAD desktops on a scale cluster.......... . . . . I solemnly swear that games WOULD be played on such a system.

@Grey said in Firefox continually crashing out in VDI: I installed Firefox Portable and removed standard FireFox. Something between v32 and v42 changed the way that profiles are handled and they can't deal with data that's copied/imaged in the way that Personas/View handles %appdata%. Odd. I haven't run into this yet, I'd knock on wood, but it's all fake plastic around me right now.

If you guys were not able to attend, we have the recording available: https://scalecomputingevents.webex.com/scalecomputingevents/lsr.php?RCID=dddd587896fdd12a664fb882e0f68650

@Dashrender The app doesn't have ads

It's still full VDI. VDI existed long before the modern concept of VDI specific tools. This is all that VDI used to be.

I've worked with multiple companies that had the opposite issue, all of their equipment control software ran on Solaris on Sparc only. So they had to maintain proprietary hardware and Solaris for everything.

@DustinB3403 said: OK Chris Up Vote this if it's right. If the user of the Windows VM is at the hardware device that is running the VM. Generally a type 2 hypervisor, such as VirtualBox, a retail key is acceptable. but so is SA and VDA. If the users are remotely accessing the VM, then SA or VDA are required. (one or the other) There are *caveats to this statement. But generally correct. *You can license Windows VDA for a device to run the VM locally, but only if that device has a Windows 7 Pro version or better. Otherwise, yes you can use a full retail license of Windows to run locally on the device OR Windows SA.

@Dashrender said: What is a desktop pool? or Horizon View? VMWare's VDI infrastructure.

I had my PCOIP setting incorrect, after putting in the correct settings everything is working great.

@NetworkNerd said: @alexntg said: @NetworkNerd said: I'm about to create a VM for our Estimating department to use to access a particular software. The company only wanted to get one seat, and as most know, a single seat tied to a specific computer is cheaper than network licensing most of the time. Basically this VM will run Windows 7 / 8.1 and allow one user at a time to login and use the program via RDP. We don't use VDI in any way. Other than the fact that this will be a VM, it is literally no different than having a desktop computer that is always online. My CDW rep is telling me I need a license of Windows 8.1 Enterprise rather than Pro so I can leverage the VDA usage rights. I thought I just needed a license of 8.1 Pro (open license, not retail) to cover the requirements here. Can someone straighten this out for me? Correct. You'll either need to pick up a VDA license (recurring annual) for the desktop VM instance or put the computers that will be accessing it under SA (recurring annual), which would also grant them Windows 8 Enterprise. Otherwise, running a Windows desktop OS in a virtual environment would be out of licensing compliance. And if I get a VDA license for the VM, does that then entitle me to a full install of Windows 7 / 8 / 8..1 on that VM even though through open licensing I am being sold an upgrade license? Or must I have a fully-licensed underlying desktop OS from which I am "upgrading"? The full OS. VDA is designed for use with non-qualified accessing devices such as thin clients.

@scottalanmiller Sent this to someone who I think would be interested in this.