ML
    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    1. Home
    2. Tags
    3. top
    Log in to post
    • All categories
    • EddieJennings

      FreePBX - High Load Averages
      IT Discussion • freepbx 14 top performance issues performance analysis • • EddieJennings

      16
      0
      Votes
      16
      Posts
      2522
      Views

      EddieJennings

      One more little tidbit of information. I can replicate the spike by viewing the Connectivity > Firewall page(s).

    • EddieJennings

      top -- What is it telling us?
      IT Discussion • freepbx 14 linux centos 7 top system administration troubleshooting • • EddieJennings

      24
      0
      Votes
      24
      Posts
      1887
      Views

      DustinB3403

      Not that there is much that can be done about it.

    • scottalanmiller

      Linux: Using Top
      IT Discussion • sam linux administration sam linux desktop administration top scott alan miller article linux centos fedora ubuntu opensuse memory process monitoring • • scottalanmiller

      20
      6
      Votes
      20
      Posts
      2964
      Views

      scottalanmiller

      @BRRABill said in Linux: Using Top:

      @scottalanmiller

      But "respecting it" means nothing.

      In WIndows, pressing a key for a function only does that function, or nothing.

      I am taking about, for example, in top where

      m

      and

      M

      do two totally different things.

      Right, an in WIndows it always does two different things. If you keep using it in places where both do nothing, you can make ANYTHING into "not sensitive". But that logic, nearly every letter on the keyboard does the same thing - nothing. So you just told me that WIndows isn't "key sensitive". See why that makes no sense?