@Danp said in Internet Explorer Flaw: https://www.ghacks.net/2020/01/23/0patch-releases-patch-for-internet-explorer-vulnerability-also-for-windows-7/ I did see that from 0patch. I don't know that I want to deploy their tool across my 2,000+ end points for this one problem.

@dbeato said in GPO for compatibility mode: @Grey said in GPO for compatibility mode: A previous admin created a gpo to alter and add an entry under the hive HKEY_CURRENT_USER in Key path Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\Ranges\Range66 which forces a single entry for compatibility mode. I've spent a lot of time testing and, while the setting is to apply once and not again, it doesn't seem to allow a user to add more sites to compatibility mode and keep that addition after a reboot. Has anyone successfully created a GPO for IE11 to enable CM for users to add items, while also pushing a list of our own? Is there a best method around for achieving this goal? I have not, I only keep adding it through GPO (In the medical field which they have many sites as this). Ditto - Just have to keep adding them via GPO. So glad we barely use IE 11 anymore.

Microsoft released a new cumulative update last night that appears to address this for Windows 10 I haven't tested it yet. This specific link is for version 1703 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4022716/windows-10-update-kb4022716 1607 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4022723/windows-10-update-kb4022723 1511 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4032693/windows-10-update-kb4032693

@gjacobse said: Well we can call it a moot point now as the supervisor told him to 'deal with it'.. That works.

@Dashrender said: @Reid-Cooper said: It's a local printer, so this issue is isolated to a single machine? Yep isolated to this machine and user... this particular one is very troubled! Isolated to the machine AND user? Have you tried from another User Profile on that machine?

Of the two, I feel like FF works better for the NodeBB sites, at least for ML.

@thecreativeone91 said: @Dashrender said: @thecreativeone91 said: @scottalanmiller said: @Dashrender said: The shear fact that they use a non default user shows that they probably have an above average ability to use their computer, which could be helpful in their job. It's been a while since I've seen a company that had IE set as a default. Same. Chrome is so easy to deploy with Group Policy and has just as much control as IE if not more. Now firefox doesn't (or didn't) pull it's proxy settings from the system so that can be an issue with some content filters. As much as I hate Chrome it is supported by our EHR vendor where FF is not... might be time to look into using it. Though we'll still have to keep IE around for the hospitals. You hate chrome? Its so much faster than firefox. They have both Administrative Template files (Group Policy) and Enterprise MSI installers to deploy. https://support.google.com/installer/answer/146164?hl=en Yep I do... I just seem to have little problems with it... Plus I like the plugs better on FF.

@IRJ said: Ok. The GPO says it will work for versions 8,9,10, and 11. So one GPO should work As long as it just looks for whatever IE is on the machine and not for a specific version.

@ajstringham said: @Bill-Kindle said: Feature request time, word of the day banner at the the top of MangoLassi ! Challenge: Properly use the word in a few sentences! I think this request could end up exasperating @addie and @steve. But I'm game! Hahahah A.J. Please go to sleep. I need to post more.