How Often Is a Degree a Negative
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Minion-Queen said:
Seriously you could live here for less than $2k a month that would include going out to eat a ton, eating really well and entertainment.
Well, technically $15K a year is way under $2K a month
Does that include meals though?
-
To give you an idea my family of 3 lived with a mortgage and all that goes with that including internet etc. Used to live on about $4K a month. That is EVERYTHING we needed to live on.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Minion-Queen said:
Seriously you could live here for less than $2k a month that would include going out to eat a ton, eating really well and entertainment.
Well, technically $15K a year is way under $2K a month
It's about 10 months of college I assume so it would be about $1,500/month. But University of Rochester is a private college so they probably are making a decent amount of money on both their tuition and room & board.
-
@Minion-Queen said:
Seriously you could live here for less than $2k a month that would include going out to eat a ton, eating really well and entertainment.
Wow. Here I can't even get an apartment under $1,000 a month. It was cheaper for me to actually get a house and mortgage than it was to rent even a small apartment. But here we have a law of no more than 2 people not relate can live in the same housing.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Minion-Queen said:
Seriously you could live here for less than $2k a month that would include going out to eat a ton, eating really well and entertainment.
Wow. Here I can't even get an apartment under $1,000 a month. It was cheaper for me to actually get a house and mortgage than it was to rent even a small apartment. But here we have a law of no more than 2 people not relate can live in the same housing.
That's the same where we live. Apartments are generally the same cost as a mortgage.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Minion-Queen said:
Seriously you could live here for less than $2k a month that would include going out to eat a ton, eating really well and entertainment.
Wow. Here I can't even get an apartment under $1,000 a month. It was cheaper for me to actually get a house and mortgage than it was to rent even a small apartment. But here we have a law of no more than 2 people not relate can live in the same housing.
WHAT? OMFG! damn lobbyists are running your town/state...
-
@Dashrender No. It's to help stop prostitution/human trafficking.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Dashrender No. It's to help stop prostitution/human trafficking.
Huh? OH, just figured out what the quote and response was. Okay, that makes sense.
-
Virginia suffers from a lot of stuff. That kills them. It makes it expensive to live for sure. In NY I used to have five roommates but we had a 3,500 sq ft house. It was amazing. Custom built for us.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Dashrender No. It's to help stop prostitution/human trafficking.
This is like saying you have to stop using cash to stop illegal sales.... it's just stupid. So many laws are written with 'good intentions' but the reality of the law is just damaging, and often has little to no effect on those you're trying to stop in the first place.
Under the assumption that prostitution is itself illegal, tell me how this law helps prevent prostitution? It really doesn't. what it does do is just provide one more charge to level against a person who they believe is doing something wrong. For example - they think you're a prostitute, but don't have enough evidence to prove it, so they hit you up with the no more than 2 non related BS law.
-
Let me tell you, @thecreativeone91's descriptions of the things going on in Virginia are enough to ensure I never even remotely think of living there. Wasn't high on my list before, but it's on the blacklist now. Give me the Mexican desert any day.
-
Yes it does. My sister in college at RIT (not living on campus but not too far off) was spending around $650 a month yes that includes meals and she did have roommates.
-
@Dashrender This is also how the gun laws in Canada got so screwy. Good intentions, insane results.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Martin9700 said:
Did it help me get my first job in IT? Yes. I also wasn't 10's of thousands of dollars in debt so I'd say the program worked.
Personally I would defined "worked" only if it was able to get you into your first job sooner than an alternative approach. What if you had been teaching yourself and job hunting during the time you were in college.... could you have gotten a job sooner that way? People who go to college them get a job always say that the job helped them to get that first job, and sometimes surely that is true. But they rarely consider the cost of lost opportunity and wonder if they had not gone to college if that would have helped them to get a different first job sooner.
Well, kind of difficult to measure that one, tbh. But in those days getting into mainframe operations required you know some things about mainframes. It wasn't an industry that said, gee you can fix a PC (who had PC's?) I'll give you a shot. It was just a different time.
-
@Martin9700 said:
Well, kind of difficult to measure that one, tbh. But in those days getting into mainframe operations required you know some things about mainframes. It wasn't an industry that said, gee you can fix a PC (who had PC's?) I'll give you a shot. It was just a different time.
Very true. Although I got into computers in the 1980s when it was not all that much different and I was working for a Fortune 100 in middle school. Yeah, it was a lucky break to be sure. But those opportunities were there. My dad didn't go to school for computers, he fell into it when the company needed him to do that.
There was certainly a time when universities were gateways to the technology. But since the 1970s I don't think that that has been that big of a deal. Universities used to gateway chemistry jobs too, but not anymore. You can, for very little money, create a home lab far superior to a college lab and get more experience than if you went to college and do it in high school too.
Most fields have a time where universities gatekept access to their resources. One by one they have dropped away. Some remain, but IT isn't one of them.
-
It would be interesting to see a study done where the Top 500 companies are interviewed and see how many of their HR departments just circular file non college degree resumes.
@scottalanmiller seems to be implying that most of them don't care about degrees anymore, I'm not so ready to believe that.
Of course I'm only talking in relation to IT.
-
@Dashrender said:
It would be interesting to see a study done where the Top 500 companies are interviewed and see how many of their HR departments just circular file non college degree resumes.
Problem is, HR will tell you one thing because they don't know how much hiring bypasses them. I've done a lot of Fortune 500 work, never had HR involved in the hiring filtering. Not once. SMB talks about that a lot, but I've never seen it in the enterprise. Ever.
-
Some places that I know don't have HR in-line disrupting hiring include CitiGroup, Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, BNP Peribas, several top 20 hedge funds, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft, eBay / PayPal, IBM, Barclays, SquarePoint, etc. It's a small sampling, but it is 100% no-HR interference. But I bet a lot of them would say otherwise if you asked HR.
-
That's awesome, but then how do you get your resume in front of the hiring manager? are you limited to only head hunters?
