ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Cloudatcost currently offline

    IT Discussion
    cloudatcost
    12
    58
    12.4k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @PSX_Defector
      last edited by

      @PSX_Defector said:

      First off, get off that double NAT box. 🙂

      Temporary situation while working at my brother in law's house. My entire home network was put in here and sits behind his existing network 🙂

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        Only two more weeks before I'm on my own network in Andalusia.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User
          last edited by

          Did anyone else notice this guy on twitter running a hosting biz off of C@C? https://twitter.com/tensioncore/with_replies seems like a bad move.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • ?
            A Former User
            last edited by

            C@C.PNG

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @A Former User
              last edited by

              @thecreativeone91 said:

              Did anyone else notice this guy on twitter running a hosting biz off of C@C? https://twitter.com/tensioncore/with_replies seems like a bad move.

              Using CloudatCost isn't the issue. Any provider can go down and lose a datacenter. Even Rackspace and Amazon have had that happen. To be an enterprise class hoster you need redundancy. Using C@C for one leg of your redundancy is perfectly fine. But they need someone else, like Rackspace, AWS, Azure, Digital Ocean or whatever for the other leg. They are basically running on a single box, no backup and just "hoping" that nothing goes wrong. They didn't bother to implement failover, HA or any DR strategy, it would appear. That's the actual problem.

              The difference is that larger providers like Amazon offer lots of disconnected datacenters and can provide full redundancy from a single company. But if you choose not to have that redundancy there, you'd be in exactly the same boat - and many people have been.

              This is purely a bad host sticking their heads in the sand and just hoping that nothing goes wrong rather than designing and implementing a reliable solution.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                Here is the traceroute FROM Toronto from a system sitting right on a shared Rogers / Bell Canada backbone....

                latest.PNG

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • AmanBhogalA
                  AmanBhogal Vendor
                  last edited by

                  Hey Everybody!
                  Late night update for you all. It's almost 9pm and we are all scrambling to make sure everything gets resolved ASAP.

                  Rogers is telling us that we should be up and running by midnight EST tonight.

                  As you can all understand, this was a pretty heavy hit for us today and any time something like this happens, its always unfortunate. No company is too big or too small to avoid these failures, and seeing Rogers experience massive network issues is a prime example of that.

                  For me personally, this could not have come at a worse time. I really enjoy interacting with each and every one of you, reading your posts about cloudatcost, seeing comments about how you are planning on using your servers, then all of a sudden... BOOM!

                  Regardless, I am still here to answer any questions you may have and I will make sure that once the dust has settled on this, we do something awesome for ML users.

                  Comparing Cloudatcost to many of the names you knew before you heard of us, we are small... but we are determined, and we WILL learn from this, and we WILL find a way to make it so that next time this happens, we are able to get everybody back up sooner and quicker than today.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                  • mlnewsM
                    mlnews
                    last edited by

                    latest.PNG

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • AmanBhogalA
                      AmanBhogal Vendor
                      last edited by

                      Hey Everybody,
                      I am happy to announce that the issue appears to be resolved.

                      thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • thanksajdotcomT
                        thanksajdotcom @AmanBhogal
                        last edited by

                        @AmanBhogal said:

                        Hey Everybody,
                        I am happy to announce that the issue appears to be resolved.

                        Woohoo! Glad to hear it!

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          Looks like all is well.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 3
                          • 3 / 3
                          • First post
                            Last post