Configure Software RAID 1 in Centos
-
Hi All,
Good Morning.I have configured the RAID1 in centos 6.2 by 2*250 GB hard disk. I checked my RAID1 by booting the system in single hard disk but the hard disk does not booted and also made one hard disk as failed and added new hard disk and synched the data from one hard disk and also checked the synched hard disk which was not booting in single hard disk.I have installed the grub in two hard disk and tried the same issue coming.The error I saw was "Kernal Panic Error". Can anyone help me to solve this issue. -
I'm sure that this is not the issue as 6.2 is very stable, but why are you on 6.2? That's many years unpatched. All CentOS 6 systems should be on 6.5 as of quite a long time ago. You need to get those systems updated, you are missing hundreds or thousands of important patches, including a few really epic ones (like Heartbleed.)
-
How did you make it boot to a single disk?
-
What process did you use to create the array?
-
What is the output of...
cat /proc/mdstatWhen you have the system running?
-
@scottalanmiller
My Client is using the Centos 6.2 and I am configuring the RAID 1 in Centos 6.2.I have confirmed the RAID 1 by the cat /proc/mdstat.Then I booted the system with the two hard disk at the same time and then I booted the hard disk which was synched the data was alone booted by disconnecting the other hard disk from the system from the motherboard.Then the system was booted to see the data in Centos but it was booting without the other hard disk -
Why are you disconnecting a drive from the motherboard? Is this not a production system and you are just testing to see what would happen in the case of a full hardware failure?
-
@Lakshmana said:
Then the system was booted to see the data in Centos but it was booting without the other hard disk
I don't understand this line.
-
@scottalanmiller There are two hard disk(sda,sdb) with RAID 1 where one of the hard disk (sdb) is made as failure and that was removed successfully.Then new hard disk(sdc) is added after removing the sdb and after that sdc is added successfully and now sda,sdc are present with RAID 1 which was resynched the data properly.When I connect only sdc to check whether the data is present in sdc alone the hard disk does not boot into Centos.When I connect two hard disk sda,sdc means the OS is booting without any issue.And I tried to boot with sda alone but the sda alone is not booted properly.The system is not production system.The system is being tested and this testing method to be implemented in Client to save data from the File Server
-
@Lakshmana said:
When I connect only sdc to check whether the data is present.....
This should never happen. You should not be doing this. RAID is a single subsystem and you should not be poking around in it. You are trying to do things that are not meant to be done. Don't attempt to look at individual disks. That is not meant to ever happen. Just because it can be done doesn't mean that it is a good idea.
-
If you want to find out if the data is all on the disk, use the MD stat file we looked at above, it tells you the status of the data on the disk.
-
@scottalanmiller Ok Sir.But my manager said that he needs to see the data to be present in the individual hard disk so only trying to see the data in individual disk.Why this cannot be done.Can you please say
-
@Lakshmana said:
@scottalanmiller Ok Sir.But my manager said that he needs to see the data to be present in the individual hard disk so only trying to see the data in individual disk.Why this cannot be done.Can you please say
Tell him "too bad." He doesn't understand what he is asking. What he wants will cause data loss. He needs to educate himself on RAID before he starts making demands. Just because a manager tells you to break things, doesn't mean that you should just break them. If he doesn't want the system to work, make sure everyone is aware that he is demanding that it be broken.
-
@Lakshmana said:
@scottalanmiller Ok Sir.But my manager said that he needs to see the data to be present in the individual hard disk so only trying to see the data in individual disk.Why this cannot be done.Can you please say
a RAID is not a backup. It's not meant to be used in this manner,
-
@Lakshmana said:
Why this cannot be done.
Because you are breaking the RAID system. RAID is never meant to be torn apart and used in parts. The array is a singular storage system. When you break it apart not everything is there, and worse, the system now has failed components and needs to repair. Even if you found what you needed, now things are broken and files all have to be copied again.
It's like Schrodinger's cat. If you open the box, you ruin everything.
You need to use the RAID tools and let RAID do its job. If he doesn't trust the RAID, why are you using it?
-
@thecreativeone91 Whether that method is not possible with the one hard disk Sir.You said that the data loss may be occured but I tried the process by booting sda hard disk alone in rescue mode and seen the data with out any loss in the shell mode.
-
@Lakshmana said:
@thecreativeone91 Whether that method is not possible with the one hard disk Sir.You said that the data loss may be occured but I tried the process by booting sda hard disk alone in rescue mode and seen the data with out any loss in the shell mode.
The data loss is not at this time, it is when you go to use the system again. What is the purpose of a storage system that you "break" to verify? That doesn't work. How will you use this once it is in production?
-
What was the point of this? if the raid failed you just put a new one in and rebuild it. The RAID Controller/Software will report when a raid is degraded, there is no need to "check it" manually.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
What was the point of this? if the raid failed you just put a new one in and rebuild it. The RAID Controller/Software will report when a raid is degraded, there is no need to "check it" manually.
"Checking it" is what will break things, too. It's just pointless, it is actually reckless and self defeating. If you want to ensure that the data is good, you can't do it this way.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
you can't do it this way.
Ok Sir.I will explain this to my Manager and after that I acknowledge you sir
