ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    edgerouteredgerouter 4colocationit supportvpnzerotier
    82 Posts 7 Posters 6.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • dafyreD
      dafyre
      last edited by

      I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

      I connect them all via ZeroTier.

      FATeknollogeeF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @Aaron Studer
        last edited by

        @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

        @FATeknollogee

        https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

        My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

        I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

          @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

          @FATeknollogee

          https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

          My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

          I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

          WTF?

          FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

          1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • FATeknollogeeF
            FATeknollogee @dafyre
            last edited by

            @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

            I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

            I connect them all via ZeroTier.

            How's the speeds between sites?

            dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • FATeknollogeeF
              FATeknollogee @dafyre
              last edited by

              @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

              I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

              I connect them all via ZeroTier.

              This is you: https://mangolassi.it/topic/19493/zerotier-site-to-site
              How has it worked out so far?

              dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • 1
                1337 @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                @FATeknollogee

                https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                WTF?

                FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                You smokin?

                "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                DashrenderD JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @1337
                  last edited by

                  @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                  @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                  @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                  @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                  @FATeknollogee

                  https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                  My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                  I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                  WTF?

                  FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                  You smokin?

                  "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                  You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                  What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                  FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @1337
                    last edited by

                    @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                    @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                    @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                    @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                    @FATeknollogee

                    https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                    My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                    I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                    WTF?

                    FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                    You smokin?

                    Totally.

                    "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                    You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                    But the point was valid even if I used the wrong terms Multiple sites with multiple things. not singe server point to point like @Dashrender said.

                    FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • FATeknollogeeF
                      FATeknollogee @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @FATeknollogee

                      https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                      My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                      I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                      WTF?

                      FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                      You smokin?

                      "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                      You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                      What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                      Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • FATeknollogeeF
                        FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @FATeknollogee

                        https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                        My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                        I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                        WTF?

                        FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                        You smokin?

                        Totally.

                        "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                        You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                        But the point was valid even if I used the wrong terms Multiple sites with multiple things. not singe server point to point like @Dashrender said.

                        Correct, multiple sites, multiple things.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                          last edited by

                          @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @FATeknollogee

                          https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                          My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                          I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                          WTF?

                          FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                          You smokin?

                          "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                          You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                          What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                          Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                          We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                          FATeknollogeeF DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • FATeknollogeeF
                            FATeknollogee @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @FATeknollogee

                            https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                            My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                            I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                            WTF?

                            FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                            You smokin?

                            "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                            You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                            What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                            Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                            We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                            Did you use Route based VPN?
                            https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPN

                            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JaredBuschJ
                              JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                              last edited by

                              @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @FATeknollogee

                              https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                              My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                              I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                              WTF?

                              FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                              You smokin?

                              "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                              You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                              What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                              Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                              We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                              Did you use Route based VPN?
                              https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPN

                              I've done both. No idea on speed difference. never ran in to router limits with both methods.

                              FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • FATeknollogeeF
                                FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                                last edited by

                                @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                @FATeknollogee

                                https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                                My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                                I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                                WTF?

                                FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                                You smokin?

                                "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                                You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                                What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                                Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                                We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                                Did you use Route based VPN?
                                https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPN

                                I've done both. No idea on speed difference. never ran in to router limits with both methods.

                                Ease of setup/ability to add more sites, one method vs the other?

                                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • dafyreD
                                  dafyre @FATeknollogee
                                  last edited by

                                  @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                  I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

                                  I connect them all via ZeroTier.

                                  How's the speeds between sites?

                                  Speeds were good. I don't remember what they were, but I transferred 1TB of stuff over ZT without any issues.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • dafyreD
                                    dafyre @FATeknollogee
                                    last edited by

                                    @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    @dafyre said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                    I'm up to 3 sites for the moment. Once of them goes away in about 2 weeks.

                                    I connect them all via ZeroTier.

                                    This is you: https://mangolassi.it/topic/19493/zerotier-site-to-site
                                    How has it worked out so far?

                                    Yeah, that's me, and it's been great. I haven't had any problems with it at all.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                      @FATeknollogee

                                      https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                                      My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                                      I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                                      WTF?

                                      FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                                      You smokin?

                                      "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                                      You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                                      What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                                      Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                                      We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                                      Which is what i was mentioning up top.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DashrenderD
                                        Dashrender @FATeknollogee
                                        last edited by

                                        @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @Aaron-Studer said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                        @FATeknollogee

                                        https://blog.kruyt.org/zerotier-on-a-ubiquiti-edgerouter/

                                        My question is why? Why setup ZT instead of site to site on all the devices?

                                        I suppose one answer could be, because it's just a single setup, instead of 5 setups.

                                        WTF?

                                        FFS, the question is about connecting multiple colo's. Do you only have one thing in each colo? Most don't. The OP specifically mentioned multiple thigns.

                                        You smokin?

                                        "The co-lo has all the gear (servers, voip, apps, file shares etc).
                                        You have 5 (or more) sites that "connect" to the co-lo."

                                        What we aren't told - is there a firewall in front of all of that stuff at the co-lo, or is it all directly on the internet? Then the OP asks - can ZT be installed on ER? I'll admit I was assuming an ER at each location, and at the co-lo in front of all of that gear.

                                        Yes, the plan is an ER in front at all locations (that plan isn't set in stone)

                                        We did this for a company from their colo but NOT with ZT, ERs using their native, much faster IPSec.

                                        Did you use Route based VPN?
                                        https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/115011377588-EdgeRouter-IPsec-Route-Based-VTI-Site-to-Site-VPN

                                        I've done both. No idea on speed difference. never ran in to router limits with both methods.

                                        Ease of setup/ability to add more sites, one method vs the other?

                                        Well, once you have ZT setup, adding another site is likely the easiest. You just add ZT on a new ER, join the mesh and you're done.

                                        With site to site VPN, you'd have to build the tunnel on both ER's (the co-lo and the new site). Not that this is hard, just possible a tiny more amount of work.

                                        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • FATeknollogeeF
                                          FATeknollogee @Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                          Well, once you have ZT setup, adding another site is likely the easiest. You just add ZT on a new ER, join the mesh and you're done.

                                          Who has done this ZT on ER install?
                                          The previous blog post seems to imply heavy/high CPU usage, wondering how this would affect performance?

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                                            last edited by

                                            @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                                            The previous blog post seems to imply heavy/high CPU usage, wondering how this would affect performance?

                                            We'd expect a bit. OpenVPN does as it is. SSL VPNs take a toll on performance.

                                            1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 1 / 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post