ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    PBX and file sharing solution

    IT Discussion
    pertino pbx file sharing
    6
    33
    11.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • AmbarishrhA
      Ambarishrh
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller I am still waiting for the guys to meet and discuss about the hosted PBX option. Meanwhile, got some info from the vendor, that their current stable elastix version used is 2.4 and said 2.5 version has some bugs which leads to call drops! Told him to send me the list of bugs, so I could verify if thats really the case or just avoiding the upgrade!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        2.4 isn't patched for security, though. That's the big issue there.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • AmbarishrhA
          Ambarishrh
          last edited by

          The changelog for 2.4 says:

          • Changes in Elastix Security:
            • The instalation of this module now its much cleaner.
            • Change of files owners for more security int he path web path.
            • Some bug fixes for Elastix-Security.
          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Ambarishrh
            last edited by

            @ambarishrh said:

            The changelog for 2.4 says:

            • Changes in Elastix Security:
              • The instalation of this module now its much cleaner.
              • Change of files owners for more security int he path web path.
              • Some bug fixes for Elastix-Security.

            That's from years ago. It is not patched for Shellshock or the SSL issues that recently were such a big deal.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • AmbarishrhA
              Ambarishrh
              last edited by

              Oh yes! Good point. Will check with the vendor about this as well

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                If they have that patched, it means that they are doing their own alterations to Elastix 2.4 and you've potentially lost the benefits of Elastix' stability because they are altering the platform.

                Really, at this point, I would only want Elastix 3.0 being rolled out. The 2.x line is a dead end and stuck on CentOS 5 now that 7 has been out for a while. It's an ancient platform.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • AmbarishrhA
                  Ambarishrh
                  last edited by

                  Thanks @scottalanmiller this would give me enough points to make sure either we get them with 3 or not to go with this vendor and stress more on the hosted pbx platform, and I might come back to you! 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    Good luck!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • AmbarishrhA
                      Ambarishrh
                      last edited by Ambarishrh

                      Got some details from the vendor. I asked them about the vulnerability on the 2.4 and their reply below:

                      Elastix 2.4 is not affected with the Shellshock vulnerability. Please find below the link for your reference.

                      http://forum.elastix.org/viewtopic.php?f=116&t=128542&p=132730&sid=6d0696d93b9f80a7d9ca3d9ca5d6ee09

                      We will not recommend 2.5 for analog lines as it has got call disconnection issue. Means if you are calling out/receive a inbound call the PBX will not disconnect the call even if the caller disconnect the call from the other end. Is that true?

                      We will do a bash upgrade to eliminate any issue of Shellshock.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        Well in a hosted system you don't have analogue lines so that isn't a factor for us.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 2 / 2
                        • First post
                          Last post