ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    I hope Wiki.js does not fail

    IT Discussion
    wiki.js fosss
    11
    61
    5.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stacksofplatesS
      stacksofplates @Obsolesce
      last edited by

      @tim_g said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      @stacksofplates said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      @stacksofplates said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      @stacksofplates said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      @jaredbusch said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

      They've stopped work on the wiki.js 1.x series completely. ugh.

      Reading the milestones for it, I’ll give them the chance.

      It's worth following. But looking at their focus being on huge breaking changes that don't matter but not getting what they have working yet (no tables, can't save changes) doesn't bode well for how they approach the project. Like you said, just one guy. If he starts flailing around doing the "next cool thing" instead of getting it solid, that's a problem. He had a pretty solid thing already, had he just put a tiny bit more effort into it, it would be way ahead of where it is.

      You can do tables. You just have to manually make them. It’s just the button doesn’t do anything.

      What's the format? I tried that and it failed.

      The normal markdown format, I’ll have to look. I think it’s something like:

      | | |
      ————
      | | |

      That doesn’t format at all correctly. I’ll look when I get home

      That's the one I tried, not sure why it didn't work. I must have done something wrong.

      0_1517712370273_table.png

      I haven't updated in a while so it could be broken on a newer version.

      See now why would you use something you have to worry about breaking all the time, like after updating. That doesn't seem logical.

      I’m not worried about anything breaking? All I said was maybe something broke since Scott said it didn’t work. I just haven’t updated it because it’s a VM in my house that I don’t hardly use and was only for testing.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stacksofplatesS
        stacksofplates
        last edited by

        0_1517748761842_wiki.png

        And as I thought, updated (from my phone) and no change. Tables still work.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Another year and more progress.... 2.0.0-beta.42 just released on Monday.

          C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • C
            Curtis @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller I thought everyone moved to bookstack?

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Curtis
              last edited by

              @Curtis said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

              @scottalanmiller I thought everyone moved to bookstack?

              A lot have, and BookStack is very nice. But my team was torn and decided, at least for now, to stay on wiki.js.

              black3dynamiteB JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • black3dynamiteB
                black3dynamite @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                @Curtis said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                @scottalanmiller I thought everyone moved to bookstack?

                A lot have, and BookStack is very nice. But my team was torn and decided, at least for now, to stay on wiki.js.

                Using a git repo is an awesome feature with Wiki.js

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @black3dynamite
                  last edited by

                  @black3dynamite said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                  @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                  @Curtis said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                  @scottalanmiller I thought everyone moved to bookstack?

                  A lot have, and BookStack is very nice. But my team was torn and decided, at least for now, to stay on wiki.js.

                  Using a git repo is an awesome feature with Wiki.js

                  Yes, we love that for sure.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • wrx7mW
                    wrx7m
                    last edited by

                    What is the prognosis for Wiki.js? Is it still only one dev?

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @wrx7m
                      last edited by

                      @wrx7m said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                      What is the prognosis for Wiki.js? Is it still only one dev?

                      Definitely very few, if not just one. But only so much development needed, I suppose. It's moving forward very slowly, but work on the 2 branch is moving forward.

                      wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • wrx7mW
                        wrx7m @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                        @wrx7m said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                        What is the prognosis for Wiki.js? Is it still only one dev?

                        Definitely very few, if not just one. But only so much development needed, I suppose. It's moving forward very slowly, but work on the 2 branch is moving forward.

                        Do you know anyone who is using it?

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                          @Curtis said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                          @scottalanmiller I thought everyone moved to bookstack?

                          A lot have, and BookStack is very nice. But my team was torn and decided, at least for now, to stay on wiki.js.

                          The only reason I chose Bookstack over Wiki.js is the WYSIWYG editor.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @wrx7m
                            last edited by

                            @wrx7m said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                            @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                            @wrx7m said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                            What is the prognosis for Wiki.js? Is it still only one dev?

                            Definitely very few, if not just one. But only so much development needed, I suppose. It's moving forward very slowly, but work on the 2 branch is moving forward.

                            Do you know anyone who is using it?

                            Well, WE do 🙂

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                              last edited by

                              @JaredBusch said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                              @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                              @Curtis said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                              @scottalanmiller I thought everyone moved to bookstack?

                              A lot have, and BookStack is very nice. But my team was torn and decided, at least for now, to stay on wiki.js.

                              The only reason I chose Bookstack over Wiki.js is the WYSIWYG editor.

                              That's awfully nice. I like that a lot in BookStack (we use BS a lot, too.) The table thing is really a big deal in wiki.js (it sucks.)

                              Also big is the ability to organize by books in BS.

                              wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • wrx7mW
                                wrx7m @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                @JaredBusch said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                @Curtis said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                @scottalanmiller I thought everyone moved to bookstack?

                                A lot have, and BookStack is very nice. But my team was torn and decided, at least for now, to stay on wiki.js.

                                The only reason I chose Bookstack over Wiki.js is the WYSIWYG editor.

                                That's awfully nice. I like that a lot in BookStack (we use BS a lot, too.) The table thing is really a big deal in wiki.js (it sucks.)

                                Also big is the ability to organize by books in BS.

                                @JaredBusch said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                @Curtis said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                @scottalanmiller I thought everyone moved to bookstack?

                                A lot have, and BookStack is very nice. But my team was torn and decided, at least for now, to stay on wiki.js.

                                The only reason I chose Bookstack over Wiki.js is the WYSIWYG editor.

                                If I ever get time, I will look at Bookstack again. I would love to have something better than some flat files (excel, word, pdf, visio) for documentation and the like.

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @wrx7m
                                  last edited by

                                  @wrx7m both wiki.js and BookStack are nice. And in reality, DokuWiki isn't bad either. We use all three, in different situations.

                                  Emad RE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • Emad RE
                                    Emad R @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                    @wrx7m both wiki.js and BookStack are nice. And in reality, DokuWiki isn't bad either. We use all three, in different situations.

                                    I love MkDocs

                                    https://docs.drush.org/en/master/cron/
                                    https://www.mkdocs.org/

                                    scottalanmillerS stacksofplatesS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @Emad R
                                      last edited by

                                      @Emad-R said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                      @wrx7m both wiki.js and BookStack are nice. And in reality, DokuWiki isn't bad either. We use all three, in different situations.

                                      I love MkDocs

                                      https://docs.drush.org/en/master/cron/
                                      https://www.mkdocs.org/

                                      A static generator? How do you handle constant updates from lots of users?

                                      stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • stacksofplatesS
                                        stacksofplates @Emad R
                                        last edited by

                                        @Emad-R said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                        @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                        @wrx7m both wiki.js and BookStack are nice. And in reality, DokuWiki isn't bad either. We use all three, in different situations.

                                        I love MkDocs

                                        https://docs.drush.org/en/master/cron/
                                        https://www.mkdocs.org/

                                        I use Asciidoctor. We did have a Hugo site but Asciidoctor has actual standards unlike markdown.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • stacksofplatesS
                                          stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by stacksofplates

                                          @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                          @Emad-R said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                          @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                          @wrx7m both wiki.js and BookStack are nice. And in reality, DokuWiki isn't bad either. We use all three, in different situations.

                                          I love MkDocs

                                          https://docs.drush.org/en/master/cron/
                                          https://www.mkdocs.org/

                                          A static generator? How do you handle constant updates from lots of users?

                                          Pipelines in a CI/CD process. Treat it as code just like anything else

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                                            last edited by

                                            @stacksofplates said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                            @Emad-R said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                            @scottalanmiller said in I hope Wiki.js does not fail:

                                            @wrx7m both wiki.js and BookStack are nice. And in reality, DokuWiki isn't bad either. We use all three, in different situations.

                                            I love MkDocs

                                            https://docs.drush.org/en/master/cron/
                                            https://www.mkdocs.org/

                                            A static generator? How do you handle constant updates from lots of users?

                                            Pipelines in a CI/CD process. Treat it as code just like anything else

                                            True, but I wonder how easy that is for non-tech staff to use.

                                            stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 2 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post