ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    What Are You Doing Right Now

    Water Closet
    time waster
    285
    88.9k
    41.3m
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      Waiting on a call that I bet is not going to happen. If it doesn't, it's time for the convention center.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        Call did not happen. Ugh

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • jmooreJ
          jmoore @DustinB3403
          last edited by

          @dustinb3403 That's impressive. I was just looking at the benchmarks that I keep from users here from a mechanical 7200 rpm drive and they range from 60-90 mb/s

          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DustinB3403D
            DustinB3403 @jmoore
            last edited by

            @jmoore It seems pretty slow to me considering this is 4 Samsung Evo 850's in an OBR10.

            jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • jmooreJ
              jmoore @DustinB3403
              last edited by

              @dustinb3403 Well I havent tested a raid 10 setup here at work. Those benchmarks are at home and i don't remember what they were. Ill try to remember to do a benchmark on my home pc. It currently has a pci3 ssd. We can compare

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403
                last edited by

                I just reinstalled, without the HBA in the way, now a single disk is running the OS, and 3 disks are in RAID0.

                I wonder what the performance is going to look like there. As for if there is any status reporting on this array or not I think is doubtful. (doesn't matter anyways since it's raid0).

                And the HBA had no reporting either, so meh. . .

                travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • travisdh1T
                  travisdh1 @DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  @dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                  And the HBA had no reporting either, so meh. . .

                  I'm reading through Craig Alanson's Expeditionary Force series right now. "meh" makes me laugh to much.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    Here is the per disk performance according to anandtech.com

                    0_1539183180463_chrome_2018-10-10_10-52-13.png

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      0_1539183231483_15391832256094158129911581043308.jpg

                      And thats the "simple spaces" performance with 3 disks.

                      DustinB3403D travisdh1T 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @DustinB3403
                        last edited by

                        Which, if this is accurate would mean that Storage Spaces isn't actually setting up a RAID0 with the expected results.

                        That's about on par with a single disk. So what gives?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • travisdh1T
                          travisdh1 @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @dustinb3403 So Storage Spaces only sees a little bump in speed on a 3 drive RAID 0 array? Something else seems to be off with that system.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403
                            last edited by DustinB3403

                            The array device is listed at the expected size, but the performance results certainly aren't showing that this is an OBR0.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ObsolesceO
                              Obsolesce
                              last edited by

                              What's one disk show?

                              DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403 @Obsolesce
                                last edited by

                                @obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                What's one disk show?

                                I'll run against the C:\ drive and see what it reports since that is a standalone disk.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • AdamFA
                                  AdamF
                                  last edited by

                                  Finally installed Windows Admin Center. Where has this been all my life? This is pretty nice.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • DustinB3403D
                                    DustinB3403
                                    last edited by

                                    0_1539184964160_15391849566316299387069802458149.jpg

                                    Single disk performance.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ObsolesceO
                                      Obsolesce
                                      last edited by

                                      Everything seems reasonable to me.

                                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ObsolesceO
                                        Obsolesce
                                        last edited by

                                        Keep in mind this is all MB/s, not IOPS.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • DustinB3403D
                                          DustinB3403 @Obsolesce
                                          last edited by

                                          @obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                          Everything seems reasonable to me.

                                          It seems normal that a RAID0 of SSDs is as fast as a single SSD non-raided?

                                          ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • ObsolesceO
                                            Obsolesce @DustinB3403
                                            last edited by

                                            @dustinb3403 said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                            @obsolesce said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

                                            Everything seems reasonable to me.

                                            It seems normal that a RAID0 of SSDs is as fast as a single SSD non-raided?

                                            The middle two are significantly higher on the RAID.

                                            Use a real tool like iometer.

                                            DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3193
                                            • 3194
                                            • 3195
                                            • 3196
                                            • 3197
                                            • 4443
                                            • 4444
                                            • 3195 / 4444
                                            • First post
                                              Last post