XenServer 7.3 Release
-
Keep in mind, for those wondering, that the Free edition in no way means unsupported. The Free edition is the pipeline to getting support and users. People deploy Free, then pay for support later in many cases.
Removing the value of Free implies that they want to shut down the funnel so that they stop getting new customers.
-
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
-
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
-
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
-
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Then they do this
https://xenserver.org/blog/entry/xenserver-7-3-changes-to-the-free-edition.html
Oh Scott you beat me to it.This is just being silly for the sake of being silly.
Oh well, no lost sleep for me as I only have one more XS host -
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
Totally viable, what's the concern? It's free, it's simple last I looked. Just install openSuse Leap and away you go. There is even a GUI for deploying it.
-
@fateknollogee said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Then they do this
https://xenserver.org/blog/entry/xenserver-7-3-changes-to-the-free-edition.html
Oh Scott you beat me to it.This is just being silly for the sake of being silly.
Oh well, no lost sleep for me as I only have one more XS hostYup, we are definitely done. No purpose in even looking at it any more.
I think Citrix has pretty much lost their way across the board. Every product I've used from them seems to be garbage today. They've fallen so far.
-
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
You can manage it through libvirt just like KVM.
-
I remembered reading about those who are XenApp or XenDesktop customers are also entitled to have XenServer. Now I wasn’t able to confirm if it’s standard or enterprise version.
-
@black3dynamite said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
I remembered reading about those who are XenApp or XenDesktop customers are also entitled to have XenServer. Now I wasn’t able to confirm if it’s standard or enterprise version.
Or maybe it was Free. Heaven only knows. But they are just paying for it already anyway. It's all just silly.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
Totally viable, what's the concern? It's free, it's simple last I looked. Just install openSuse Leap and away you go. There is even a GUI for deploying it.
Then why the need for XS?
-
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
Totally viable, what's the concern? It's free, it's simple last I looked. Just install openSuse Leap and away you go. There is even a GUI for deploying it.
Then why the need for XS?
@Dashrender you're missing that XenServer has XAPI, which literally turns Xen into XenServer.
Without XAPI tool set, you're just operating Xen, on CentOS, Ubuntu so on and so on. It's the tool set that has the value. Not the provider of the tool set.
-
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
Totally viable, what's the concern? It's free, it's simple last I looked. Just install openSuse Leap and away you go. There is even a GUI for deploying it.
Then why the need for XS?
There is no need for it. Who said we needed it?
-
@dustinb3403 said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
Totally viable, what's the concern? It's free, it's simple last I looked. Just install openSuse Leap and away you go. There is even a GUI for deploying it.
Then why the need for XS?
@Dashrender you're missing that XenServer has XAPI, which literally turns Xen into XenServer.
Without XAPI tool set, you're just operating Xen, on CentOS, Ubuntu so on and so on. It's the tool set that has the value. Not the provider of the tool set.
Is it? What good does XAPI really do? Other than enable XO, XAPI is pretty useless to the end users.
-
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dustinb3403 said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
Totally viable, what's the concern? It's free, it's simple last I looked. Just install openSuse Leap and away you go. There is even a GUI for deploying it.
Then why the need for XS?
@Dashrender you're missing that XenServer has XAPI, which literally turns Xen into XenServer.
Without XAPI tool set, you're just operating Xen, on CentOS, Ubuntu so on and so on. It's the tool set that has the value. Not the provider of the tool set.
Is it? What good does XAPI really do? Other than enable XO, XAPI is pretty useless to the end users.
. . .
-
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dustinb3403 said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@momurda said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Most of the things they removed are meh, but Storage Motion, come on.
Yeah, that's just ridiculous. These are key features that everyone has for free. If you don't have stuff like this, you aren't even trying today.
And by everyone - you now mean Hyper-V and KVM - who, if anyone, else?
The other two players I know of (ESXi and XS) don't have it free.
Well if you look at hypervisors, rather than resulting products, then all the "in the game" players have it... KVM, Xen, and Hyper-V. Only ESXi lacks it, and we don't consider them a viable short lister.
And how viable is Xen for the SMB to use?
Totally viable, what's the concern? It's free, it's simple last I looked. Just install openSuse Leap and away you go. There is even a GUI for deploying it.
Then why the need for XS?
@Dashrender you're missing that XenServer has XAPI, which literally turns Xen into XenServer.
Without XAPI tool set, you're just operating Xen, on CentOS, Ubuntu so on and so on. It's the tool set that has the value. Not the provider of the tool set.
Is it? What good does XAPI really do? Other than enable XO, XAPI is pretty useless to the end users.
Then why did XS have value at all? Why didn't people just keep using Xen and oVirt, etc?
-
And they still only support ext3 and vhd.
-
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Then why did XS have value at all? Why didn't people just keep using Xen and oVirt, etc?
Why do people talk about Citrix like it's the best thing since sliced bread?
There's always been a "ZFS" cult like following when it comes to Citrix, why...who knows!
-
@fateknollogee said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
@dashrender said in XenServer 7.3 Release:
Then why did XS have value at all? Why didn't people just keep using Xen and oVirt, etc?
Why do people talk about Citrix like it's the best thing since sliced bread?
There's always been a "ZFS" cult like following when it comes to Citrix, why...who knows!
Yeah, they are a weird company. XenApp isn't terrible but... meh.
