ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Marriott Hotels Fined by FCC for Blocking Guest WiFI

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News
    regulatoryfccwifi
    16 Posts 6 Posters 3.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User @Reid Cooper
      last edited by

      @Reid-Cooper said:

      http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/03/travel/marriott-fcc-wi-fi-fine/index.html

      I did not even know that blocking wireless carriers was illegal. Great to know!

      Yeah, has to do with 911 security etc I believe.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender
        last edited by

        According to the article, Marriott wasn't using 'jammers' per se - and they weren't blocking cellular signals, they were only affecting personal wifi hotspots.

        I'm guessing the tech works by broadcasting the same SSID as the detected hotspot, then sends out garbage to confuse any clients trying to associate.

        ? scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • thanksajdotcomT
          thanksajdotcom
          last edited by

          This is just wrong! Glad they got fined!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender said:

            According to the article, Marriott wasn't using 'jammers' per se - and they weren't blocking cellular signals, they were only affecting personal wifi hotspots.

            I'm guessing the tech works by broadcasting the same SSID as the detected hotspot, then sends out garbage to confuse any clients trying to associate.

            That's kinda cool...They must charge for WiFi access...haha

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              According to the article, Marriott wasn't using 'jammers' per se - and they weren't blocking cellular signals, they were only affecting personal wifi hotspots.

              I'm guessing the tech works by broadcasting the same SSID as the detected hotspot, then sends out garbage to confuse any clients trying to associate.

              That would be jamming 🙂

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @A Former User
                last edited by

                @Hubtech said:

                That's kinda cool...They must charge for WiFi access...haha

                Yes they do, as much as $1,000 per device!

                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @Hubtech said:

                  That's kinda cool...They must charge for WiFi access...haha

                  Yes they do, as much as $1,000 per device!

                  baha, that's nuts.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • T
                    technobabble
                    last edited by

                    Ha ha...Marriott said it was to protect everyone from insidious threats!

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @technobabble
                      last edited by

                      @technobabble said:

                      Ha ha...Marriott said it was to protect everyone from insidious threats!

                      Yeah, I don't see that being a very convincing argument.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • T
                        technobabble @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @technobabble said:

                        Ha ha...Marriott said it was to protect everyone from insidious threats!

                        Yeah, I don't see that being a very convincing argument.

                        Thus my laugh...and I it didn't work for the FCC either! Can you imagine; " your honor, we MUST be able to protect our clients from INSIDIOUS THREATS! bahaha

                        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender @technobabble
                          last edited by

                          @technobabble said:

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @technobabble said:

                          Ha ha...Marriott said it was to protect everyone from insidious threats!

                          Yeah, I don't see that being a very convincing argument.

                          Thus my laugh...and I it didn't work for the FCC either! Can you imagine; " your honor, we MUST be able to protect our clients from INSIDIOUS THREATS! bahaha

                          Now you sound like the emperor.

                          T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • T
                            technobabble @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender lol!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              Emperor-penguins-serious-risk-of-extinction.jpg

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender
                                last edited by

                                I was going for this.
                                02emperor350.jpg

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                • 1 / 1
                                • First post
                                  Last post