ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    AetherStore

    IT Discussion
    aetherstore storage
    9
    30
    4.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said:

      The trend of moving toward small SSDs kinda kills this.

      This is definitely a network by network decision because of things like that.

      My clients all get standard Dell/HP boxes with the default drive. This is almost 100% of the time a 500GB drive right now.

      On top of that, I have their user libraries redirected to the server. This leaves me with a LOT of space available for something like AetherStore at these clients.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch
        last edited by

        Re: Feedback
        THe one thing I told them that would help sell it would be to have some tool a potential customer could run that would tell them how much potential space there is available.

        For someone using SpiceWorks, I suggested a free app in the new SW app space that would simply check the SW database and report drive free space amounts.

        For others, a WMI tool to just scan the network quickly may be the best option.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said:

          The trend of moving toward small SSDs kinda kills this.

          That's very true, NTG is all SSD for example. Chromebooks would kill this too. But that's a temporary thing. As SSDs grow in size the opportunity will return.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • ?
            A Former User
            last edited by

            Yeah, I mean I don't see this becoming main stream storage or anything. I honestly wouldn't use it for anything but "replaceables" software installers, etc.

            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @A Former User
              last edited by

              @thecreativeone91 said:

              Yeah, I mean I don't see this becoming main stream storage or anything. I honestly wouldn't use it for anything but "replaceables" software installers, etc.

              For me, this is a replacement to a local NAS at clients. Said NAS would be the primary local backup target. More storage for the same cost, only used hit and miss during the day, and long writes in the evening.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch said:

                @thecreativeone91 said:

                Yeah, I mean I don't see this becoming main stream storage or anything. I honestly wouldn't use it for anything but "replaceables" software installers, etc.

                For me, this is a replacement to a local NAS at clients. Said NAS would be the primary local backup target. More storage for the same cost, only used hit and miss during the day, and long writes in the evening.

                That is really the primary use case. A local NAS for the desktop users in a local office space.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • NetworkNerdN
                  NetworkNerd
                  last edited by

                  I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                  JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @NetworkNerd
                    last edited by

                    @NetworkNerd said:

                    I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                    I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                    There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                    thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • thanksajdotcomT
                      thanksajdotcom @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @JaredBusch said:

                      @NetworkNerd said:

                      I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                      I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                      There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                      I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                      DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        @ajstringham said:

                        @JaredBusch said:

                        @NetworkNerd said:

                        I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                        I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                        There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                        I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                        I think they would be better served with real cloud backup, not a sync solution.

                        thanksajdotcomT scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • thanksajdotcomT
                          thanksajdotcom @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @Dashrender said:

                          @ajstringham said:

                          @JaredBusch said:

                          @NetworkNerd said:

                          I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                          I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                          There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                          I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                          I think they would be better served with real cloud backup, not a sync solution.

                          Why do you say that?

                          DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @thanksajdotcom
                            last edited by

                            @ajstringham said:

                            Why do you say that?

                            Why are you going to the cloud with this solution if not for a backup?

                            I can't remember who, but someone here in ML thinks of ODfB as a 'backup.' But Scott definitely put it more accurately - they are a sync solution that backs up, but they are not a backup.

                            In the same token, For what you would use this technology for, you probably need a real backup more than a sync solution.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @NetworkNerd
                              last edited by

                              @NetworkNerd said:

                              I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                              I think that you can use any existing backup mechanism with it.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                                last edited by

                                @ajstringham said:

                                @JaredBusch said:

                                @NetworkNerd said:

                                I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                                I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                                There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                                I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                                How are you picturing the two working together?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  @ajstringham said:

                                  @JaredBusch said:

                                  @NetworkNerd said:

                                  I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                                  I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                                  There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                                  I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                                  I think they would be better served with real cloud backup, not a sync solution.

                                  Definitely the more important association needed. I can't even think of how this would usefully work with a sync solution.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                                    last edited by

                                    @ajstringham said:

                                    @Dashrender said:

                                    @ajstringham said:

                                    @JaredBusch said:

                                    @NetworkNerd said:

                                    I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                                    I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                                    There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                                    I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                                    I think they would be better served with real cloud backup, not a sync solution.

                                    Why do you say that?

                                    What is your goal? I think we are struggling to picture the use case that you are picturing. If you have cloud storage, how are you using Aetherstore? And vice versa?

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 1
                                    • 2
                                    • 2 / 2
                                    • First post
                                      Last post