ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    AetherStore

    IT Discussion
    aetherstore storage
    9
    30
    4.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NetworkNerdN
      NetworkNerd
      last edited by

      I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

      JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @NetworkNerd
        last edited by

        @NetworkNerd said:

        I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

        I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

        There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

        thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • thanksajdotcomT
          thanksajdotcom @JaredBusch
          last edited by

          @JaredBusch said:

          @NetworkNerd said:

          I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

          I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

          There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

          I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

          DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DashrenderD
            Dashrender @thanksajdotcom
            last edited by

            @ajstringham said:

            @JaredBusch said:

            @NetworkNerd said:

            I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

            I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

            There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

            I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

            I think they would be better served with real cloud backup, not a sync solution.

            thanksajdotcomT scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • thanksajdotcomT
              thanksajdotcom @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              @ajstringham said:

              @JaredBusch said:

              @NetworkNerd said:

              I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

              I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

              There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

              I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

              I think they would be better served with real cloud backup, not a sync solution.

              Why do you say that?

              DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @thanksajdotcom
                last edited by

                @ajstringham said:

                Why do you say that?

                Why are you going to the cloud with this solution if not for a backup?

                I can't remember who, but someone here in ML thinks of ODfB as a 'backup.' But Scott definitely put it more accurately - they are a sync solution that backs up, but they are not a backup.

                In the same token, For what you would use this technology for, you probably need a real backup more than a sync solution.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @NetworkNerd
                  last edited by

                  @NetworkNerd said:

                  I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                  I think that you can use any existing backup mechanism with it.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                    last edited by

                    @ajstringham said:

                    @JaredBusch said:

                    @NetworkNerd said:

                    I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                    I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                    There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                    I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                    How are you picturing the two working together?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said:

                      @ajstringham said:

                      @JaredBusch said:

                      @NetworkNerd said:

                      I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                      I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                      There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                      I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                      I think they would be better served with real cloud backup, not a sync solution.

                      Definitely the more important association needed. I can't even think of how this would usefully work with a sync solution.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @thanksajdotcom
                        last edited by

                        @ajstringham said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @ajstringham said:

                        @JaredBusch said:

                        @NetworkNerd said:

                        I think if they offered their product with some kind of backup to a cloud target it would be a little better. But I agree it is worth a shot for backup targets, etc.

                        I found it interesting that they were not trying to be a Cloud Backup solution. hell they are not even trying to be a backup solution. They are simply making a use for unused space.

                        There is a plethora of choice when it comes to cloud data storage. I think this may be a smarter move to skip it. Maybe a partnership for a sync to offsite kinda thing would work for them.

                        I could see them partnering with Box or Dropbox as a beneficial partnership.

                        I think they would be better served with real cloud backup, not a sync solution.

                        Why do you say that?

                        What is your goal? I think we are struggling to picture the use case that you are picturing. If you have cloud storage, how are you using Aetherstore? And vice versa?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 2 / 2
                        • First post
                          Last post