ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Accessing VirtualHost Locally on Ubuntu Web Server

    IT Discussion
    4
    18
    1.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @A Former User
      last edited by

      @thecreativeone91 said:

      @ajstringham said:

      172.16.255.20

      You can always add an A record for www.site.com for 172.16.255.20 locally. You can even do this on DD-WRT.

      That only works if the DD-WRT device is your DNS server.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        @thecreativeone91 said:

        @ajstringham said:

        172.16.255.20

        You can always add an A record for www.site.com for 172.16.255.20 locally. You can even do this on DD-WRT.

        That only works if the DD-WRT device is your DNS server.

        Well, yeah. I assumed that would be implied.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @A Former User
          last edited by

          @thecreativeone91 he was unaware of the hosts file, it is unlikely that he is running an internally DNS caching server.

          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • thanksajdotcomT
            thanksajdotcom
            last edited by

            The hosts file trick worked! They say it can take up to 24 hours. @scottalanmiller , you're right in saying it shouldn't take that long. However, until it propagates systemwide, the hosts file trick works. Thanks!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              How long has it been at this point?

              thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ?
                A Former User @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @thecreativeone91 he was unaware of the hosts file, it is unlikely that he is running an internally DNS caching server.

                @ajstringham You didn't know about the hosts file. haha.

                thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • thanksajdotcomT
                  thanksajdotcom @A Former User
                  last edited by

                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @thecreativeone91 he was unaware of the hosts file, it is unlikely that he is running an internally DNS caching server.

                  @ajstringham You didn't know about the hosts file. haha.

                  I know about the hosts file, but it never occurred to me to use it in that way. Had I thought about it long enough, it probably would have. But off-hand, I didn't think of it that way.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • thanksajdotcomT
                    thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    How long has it been at this point?

                    Maybe a little over an hour.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      That's not that long then. Understandable that it has not flowed everywhere yet.

                      thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • thanksajdotcomT
                        thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        That's not that long then. Understandable that it has not flowed everywhere yet.

                        Exactly. I'm not upset that it hasn't. I was just looking for a way to edit it locally while I waited.

                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          I find that if I set my DNS as the first task that I do, normally it is working by the time that I need it.

                          thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • JaredBuschJ
                            JaredBusch @thanksajdotcom
                            last edited by

                            @ajstringham said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            That's not that long then. Understandable that it has not flowed everywhere yet.

                            Exactly. I'm not upset that it hasn't. I was just looking for a way to edit it locally while I waited.

                            Also, if you are using Apache, the first thing listed in your vhost section will be will be the default website if you go to it by IP. At least that is what my CentOS 7 webserver is doing. So I intentionally arranged my vhost file for one specific site to show up if someone uses the IP.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • thanksajdotcomT
                              thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said:

                              I find that if I set my DNS as the first task that I do, normally it is working by the time that I need it.

                              The DNS nameservers were already set. I'm hosting the server on my own hardware. It's waiting for that nameserver to propagate the info out to the world. Probably another couple hours and we'll be good. I just wanted the initial wordpress setup stuff done before the site hit the www.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post