ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam

    IT Discussion
    shadow protect veeam comparison storagecraft
    7
    51
    8.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403
      last edited by

      That doesn't really answer the question guys. I know Veeam is the go to solution if you need a backup appliance. But I currently have one, and am disappointed with it.

      While not my call to get rid of SPX, I can at least bring up the option. Just need to know why we might change from SPX to Veeam.

      We are using SPX as an agent on our systems, so the same would likely apply to Veeam.

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
        last edited by

        @DustinB3403 said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

        That doesn't really answer the question guys. I know Veeam is the go to solution if you need a backup appliance.

        Veeam doesn't make appliances. That's Unitrends or Datto.

        DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

          @DustinB3403 said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

          That doesn't really answer the question guys. I know Veeam is the go to solution if you need a backup appliance.

          Veeam doesn't make appliances. That's Unitrends or Datto.

          . . .

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            The biggest issue will be that SPX has been around for a while but Veeam's agent based backups are brand new. So almost no one out there using them, especially not the commercial, scheduled ones.

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

              The biggest issue will be that SPX has been around for a while but Veeam's agent based backups are brand new. So almost no one out there using them, especially not the commercial, scheduled ones.

              https://go.veeam.com/windows-backup

              OK good to know, I didn't know they had agents... Looks like the Windows one is still in Beta.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender
                last edited by

                So what is it about SPX you don't like? Their boot recovery disk doesn't work? That does seem like a total failure on their part for full system recovery.

                I've used Veeam (pre agent) to backup full VMs and then restore individual files with no issues. I've never restored a full system/VM though through the paid product.

                I have used Veeam Endpoint Protection to make full backups and then restored those full backups into a VM and they worked. (in fact in the process of restoring one right now).

                DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403 @Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                  So what is it about SPX you don't like? Their boot recovery disk doesn't work? That does seem like a total failure on their part for full system recovery.

                  This and the fact that the platform as a whole seems horribly convoluted.

                  DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    I've always been confused why you were/are running two separate backups of your XenServer VMs. SPX should be able to handle everything for you. Sure SPX might not be able to recreate the VMs themselves in XS in case of a full restore need, but it takes like 2 mins to build the VM, assign the VDIs, then boot from the recovery media for SPX - restore done. A one step restore.

                    With your current method, you restore using XO, then you have to run SPX to put the latest version of the files back from SPX, two step restore.

                    DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      @DustinB3403 said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                      @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                      So what is it about SPX you don't like? Their boot recovery disk doesn't work? That does seem like a total failure on their part for full system recovery.

                      This and the fact that the platform as a whole seems horribly convoluted.

                      What makes it a failure?
                      What makes it convoluted? Can you share screen shots of things that you feel are overly complicated?

                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                        I've always been confused why you were/are running two separate backups of your XenServer VMs. SPX should be able to handle everything for you. Sure SPX might not be able to recreate the VMs themselves in XS in case of a full restore need, but it takes like 2 mins to build the VM, assign the VDIs, then boot from the recovery media for SPX - restore done. A one step restore.

                        With your current method, you restore using XO, then you have to run SPX to put the latest version of the files back from SPX, two step restore.

                        It was an opt'd for approach, to have the block level with XO, and then still have the SPX option.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DustinB3403D
                          DustinB3403 @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                          @DustinB3403 said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                          @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                          So what is it about SPX you don't like? Their boot recovery disk doesn't work? That does seem like a total failure on their part for full system recovery.

                          This and the fact that the platform as a whole seems horribly convoluted.

                          What makes it a failure?
                          What makes it convoluted? Can you share screen shots of things that you feel are overly complicated?

                          The failure is on the recovery environment. The user interface when using the program (i don't have screenshots) is just awkward to say the least.

                          It doesn't help that I use SPX so rarely in my day to day, but if you recall going from Windows 2000 to XP, you'll understand what it feels like.

                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @DustinB3403
                            last edited by

                            @DustinB3403 said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                            @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                            @DustinB3403 said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                            @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                            So what is it about SPX you don't like? Their boot recovery disk doesn't work? That does seem like a total failure on their part for full system recovery.

                            This and the fact that the platform as a whole seems horribly convoluted.

                            What makes it a failure?
                            What makes it convoluted? Can you share screen shots of things that you feel are overly complicated?

                            The failure is on the recovery environment. The user interface when using the program (i don't have screenshots) is just awkward to say the least.

                            It doesn't help that I use SPX so rarely in my day to day, but if you recall going from Windows 2000 to XP, you'll understand what it feels like.

                            Is that really the fault of the product? I wouldn't think so. Scott's post from a few mins ago talks about book - really more about reading in this context - but it sounds like you need to sit down and RTFM. 😉

                            Don't feel bad, I'm not great at doing that myself.

                            DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DustinB3403D
                              DustinB3403 @Dashrender
                              last edited by

                              @Dashrender I'd love to RTFM if I ever had time, there are other issues that cause me to not be able to do this (management), but also the expectation that I be an "expert" on SPX.

                              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @DustinB3403
                                last edited by

                                @DustinB3403 said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                @Dashrender I'd love to RTFM if I ever had time, there are other issues that cause me to not be able to do this (management), but also the expectation that I be an "expert" on SPX.

                                OK @scottalanmiller Here's a question - would you call Dustin (or anyone) lazy for not taking time out of their non working hours to read manual in the above situation?

                                If you do, when do you consider yourself 'off the clock' enough to not be learning something new for IT?

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender you are using the example of someone not wanting to work while not paid to compare to an unrelated conversation where someone didn't want to do their job while on the clock.

                                  DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DashrenderD
                                    Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                    @Dashrender you are using the example of someone not wanting to work while not paid to compare to an unrelated conversation where someone didn't want to do their job while on the clock.

                                    yes and no - I was more wondering if you consider it an IT person's job to learn regardless of being paid or not.

                                    Let's assume Dustin is personally trying to learn about MariaDB. But his work needs him to learn about SPX. Should he spend that free time that he wanted to spend on MariaDB instead on SPX? or is it his company's job to give him the time to learn on their dime?

                                    ObsolesceO 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • ObsolesceO
                                      Obsolesce @Dashrender
                                      last edited by

                                      @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                      @Dashrender you are using the example of someone not wanting to work while not paid to compare to an unrelated conversation where someone didn't want to do their job while on the clock.

                                      yes and no - I was more wondering if you consider it an IT person's job to learn regardless of being paid or not.

                                      Let's assume Dustin is personally trying to learn about MariaDB. But his work needs him to learn about SPX. Should he spend that free time that he wanted to spend on MariaDB instead on SPX? or is it his company's job to give him the time to learn on their dime?

                                      Unless the company is paying you, its illegal to work. Learning something for your job is working.

                                      DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DashrenderD
                                        Dashrender @Obsolesce
                                        last edited by

                                        @Tim_G said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                        @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                        @Dashrender you are using the example of someone not wanting to work while not paid to compare to an unrelated conversation where someone didn't want to do their job while on the clock.

                                        yes and no - I was more wondering if you consider it an IT person's job to learn regardless of being paid or not.

                                        Let's assume Dustin is personally trying to learn about MariaDB. But his work needs him to learn about SPX. Should he spend that free time that he wanted to spend on MariaDB instead on SPX? or is it his company's job to give him the time to learn on their dime?

                                        Unless the company is paying you, its illegal to work. Learning something for your job is working.

                                        Wow - there are so many pitfalls to that thinking.

                                        But learning something on your own for your job is definitely not the same as working - if you bosses demand you spend your non paid time to learn something, that would be illegal/working.

                                        ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • ObsolesceO
                                          Obsolesce @Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                          @Tim_G said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                          @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                          @scottalanmiller said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                          @Dashrender you are using the example of someone not wanting to work while not paid to compare to an unrelated conversation where someone didn't want to do their job while on the clock.

                                          yes and no - I was more wondering if you consider it an IT person's job to learn regardless of being paid or not.

                                          Let's assume Dustin is personally trying to learn about MariaDB. But his work needs him to learn about SPX. Should he spend that free time that he wanted to spend on MariaDB instead on SPX? or is it his company's job to give him the time to learn on their dime?

                                          Unless the company is paying you, its illegal to work. Learning something for your job is working.

                                          Wow - there are so many pitfalls to that thinking.

                                          But learning something on your own for your job is definitely not the same as working - if you bosses demand you spend your non paid time to learn something, that would be illegal/working.

                                          Right but that's not how you said it initially.

                                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DashrenderD
                                            Dashrender @Obsolesce
                                            last edited by

                                            @Tim_G said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                            @Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

                                            Let's assume Dustin is personally trying to learn about MariaDB. But his work needs him to learn about SPX. Should he spend that free time that he wanted to spend on MariaDB instead on SPX? or is it his company's job to give him the time to learn on their dime?

                                            Right but that's not how you said it initially.

                                            Nothing in that statement implies the boss is making Dustin learn on his own time.

                                            I was really trying to see if Scott thinks that Dustin should be learning something not work related vs something definitely helpful now - in the end it doesn't matter, It was only a question.

                                            ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post