XenServer installation SR issue
-
@BRRABill said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04
What does lvscan show you?
I had a similar error once because my lv was not active.
I'll check when I get back home tonight. Thanks.
-
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer installation SR issue:
The RAID array should appear as a single drive and nothing that XS does should make a rebuild of the array needed. If that is happening, there is a deeper problem.
It does. It shows as a single 6 TB "drive"
Should not need to rebuild, then. If the underlying array is corrupting, then the issue is at the controller or disk level.
XS is actually installed on this array. If the RAID controller was corrupting the array, wouldn't this hose the XS installation as well and not make it bootable?
If XS is installed on the array, you should not be running 'fsck /dev/sda'
What's the output of
parted -l /dev/sda -
@travisdh1
So here is what that command returns:[root@xenserver ~]# parted -l /dev/sda Model: DELL PERC H700 (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 6000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: gpt Disk Flags: pmbr_boot Number Start End Size File system Name Flags 5 1049kB 4296MB 4295MB ext3 2 4296MB 23.6GB 19.3GB 1 23.6GB 43.0GB 19.3GB ext3 4 43.0GB 43.5GB 537MB bios_grub, legacy_boot 6 43.5GB 44.6GB 1074MB linux-swap(v1) 3 44.6GB 6000GB 5956GB lvm Error: ff8e3b--dd7c--c3c4--3125--22569f5bbd77-0bff8e3b--dd7c--c3c4--3125--22569f5bbd77: unrecognised disk label Model: Linux device-mapper (linear) (dm) Disk /dev/mapper/XSLocalEXT--0bff8e3b--dd7c--c3c4--3125--22569f5bbd77-0bff8e3b--dd7c--c3c4--3125--22569f5bbd77: 5955GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: unknown Disk Flags: -
@BRRABill said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04
What does lvscan show you?
I had a similar error once because my lv was not active.
[root@xenserver ~]# lvscan ACTIVE '/dev/XSLocalEXT-0bff8e3b-dd7c-c3c4-3125-22569f5bbd77/0bff8e3b-dd7c-c3c4-3125-22569f5bbd77' [5.42 TiB] inherit -
@fuznutz04 @BRRABill may be correct, that lv isn't getting loaded for some reason. Does 'lvscan' show anything?
The 'unrecognised disk label' shouldn't happen. Something went wrong for XS to not load lvm on boot, figuring out what is the hard part. If it's the same thing that happened before, @scottalanmiller is probably correct that the RAID card is at fault.
-
@travisdh1 I just did a test on the card using the built in diagnostics with the LifeCycle controller. All tests passed.
The hard drives in the RAID set were taken from another old NAS device that had it's own RAID on it. Could something be left over on the disks that is not being properly wiped during creation of the new RAID set?
-
New plan. I'm going to destroy the entire RAID array again, and recreate. This time, I'm going to do a full initialization. Previously, I just did a "fast initialization." with 4 3 TB drives, this should take about 1.5 years to complete.
-
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
New plan. I'm going to destroy the entire RAID array again, and recreate. This time, I'm going to do a full initialization. Previously, I just did a "fast initialization." with 4 3 TB drives, this should take about 1.5 years to complete.
At least it's RAID10, so only 1.5 years instead of 6 years for a RAID6
-
@travisdh1 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
New plan. I'm going to destroy the entire RAID array again, and recreate. This time, I'm going to do a full initialization. Previously, I just did a "fast initialization." with 4 3 TB drives, this should take about 1.5 years to complete.
At least it's RAID10, so only 1.5 years instead of 6 years for a RAID6
Valid point. Glass is half full.
-
@travisdh1 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04 @BRRABill may be correct, that lv isn't getting loaded for some reason. Does 'lvscan' show anything?
The 'unrecognised disk label' shouldn't happen. Something went wrong for XS to not load lvm on boot, figuring out what is the hard part. If it's the same thing that happened before, @scottalanmiller is probably correct that the RAID card is at fault.
It does say it is ACTIVE though, which is strange.
But it definitely seems like XS isn't "formatting" it correctly. "Formatting" being whatever you call setting a LV up.
-
@BRRABill said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@travisdh1 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04 @BRRABill may be correct, that lv isn't getting loaded for some reason. Does 'lvscan' show anything?
The 'unrecognised disk label' shouldn't happen. Something went wrong for XS to not load lvm on boot, figuring out what is the hard part. If it's the same thing that happened before, @scottalanmiller is probably correct that the RAID card is at fault.
It does say it is ACTIVE though, which is strange.
But it definitely seems like XS isn't "formatting" it correctly. "Formatting" being whatever you call setting a LV up.
LV would be voluming. Formatting is a reference to the file system level.
-
@scottalanmiller said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@BRRABill said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@travisdh1 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04 @BRRABill may be correct, that lv isn't getting loaded for some reason. Does 'lvscan' show anything?
The 'unrecognised disk label' shouldn't happen. Something went wrong for XS to not load lvm on boot, figuring out what is the hard part. If it's the same thing that happened before, @scottalanmiller is probably correct that the RAID card is at fault.
It does say it is ACTIVE though, which is strange.
But it definitely seems like XS isn't "formatting" it correctly. "Formatting" being whatever you call setting a LV up.
LV would be voluming. Formatting is a reference to the file system level.
Thank you LVM/Linux sensei.
-
48% initialized. I might actually be able to try an install again today!
-
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
48% initialized. I might actually be able to try an install again today!
Are you watching it? It always goes slower that way.
I like to go across the building and have a few beers while waiting.
-
@BRRABill said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
48% initialized. I might actually be able to try an install again today!
Are you watching it? It always goes slower that way.
I like to go across the building and have a few beers while waiting.
Well, The server is sitting on my floor, with a monitor beside my desk. I cant help it, I keep glancing over at it. Maybe I should just turn the monitor off. Cant have a few beers just yet... need to focus for a few more hours.
-
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@BRRABill said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
48% initialized. I might actually be able to try an install again today!
Are you watching it? It always goes slower that way.
I like to go across the building and have a few beers while waiting.
Well, The server is sitting on my floor, with a monitor beside my desk. I cant help it, I keep glancing over at it. Maybe I should just turn the monitor off. Cant have a few beers just yet... need to focus for a few more hours.
Beer helps me focus. Then makes me sleep. So I have to be very productive in those few hours I'm awake.
-
@BRRABill Exactly. It's the sleep part that isn't good while trying to get stuff done.
-
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
@BRRABill Exactly. It's the sleep part that isn't good while trying to get stuff done.
But think how refreshed you will be when you wake up from your catnap at 4:00.
-
So the Full initialization of the raid set and reinstall did nothing. Same results as before.
-
@fuznutz04 said in XenServer installation SR issue:
So the Full initialization of the raid set and reinstall did nothing. Same results as before.
Of course it is the same result, this is not where your problem is. I am not sure why you would think that the result would be different. Recreating the array loses everything always. Does not matter if the initialization is full or fast.
Now, I do not know where your problem is as I have no experience with XS 7 and little with 6.5.
Setting up my home lab and testing this out is waiting on me having private office space again. Instead of in the family room.
