ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    I did a thing, have a quick Linux question

    IT Discussion
    linux xen xenserver hyper-v kvm
    13
    61
    7.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • wirestyle22W
      wirestyle22 @Sparkum
      last edited by

      @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

      @dafyre

      Ya depending how this goes I could definately see myself going that route.

      So many wasted resources with windows.

      You aren't wrong

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • S
        Sparkum @dafyre
        last edited by

        @dafyre

        Are you able to group harddrives in a non raid format with linux?

        Like a stablebit drive pool for linux kind of thing?

        Versus making raid 0

        wirestyle22W DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • wirestyle22W
          wirestyle22 @Sparkum
          last edited by wirestyle22

          @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

          @dafyre

          Are you able to group harddrives in a non raid format with linux?

          Like a stablebit drive pool for linux kind of thing?

          Versus making raid 0

          I know that you're asking @dafyre but just use ZFS. Software raid on Linux in the modern world has very little overhead.

          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DustinB3403D
            DustinB3403 @Sparkum
            last edited by

            @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

            @dafyre

            Are you able to group harddrives in a non raid format with linux?

            Like a stablebit drive pool for linux kind of thing?

            Versus making raid 0

            Why would you do this, when you could use MD Raid and have a highly resilient solution?

            S stacksofplatesS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Sparkum @wirestyle22
              last edited by

              @wirestyle22

              I'll add that to my "look into" pile

              Thanks!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                Sparkum @DustinB3403
                last edited by

                @DustinB3403

                I've got my important media and my "who the heck cares" media.

                DustinB3403D wirestyle22W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403 @Sparkum
                  last edited by

                  @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

                  @DustinB3403

                  I've got my important media and my "who the heck cares" media.

                  the Who the heck media you could still put onto RAID0 array.

                  S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • S
                    Sparkum @DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    @DustinB3403

                    I'd rather lose 1 disk and 2TB versus lose 1 disk and 6TB

                    wirestyle22W DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • wirestyle22W
                      wirestyle22 @Sparkum
                      last edited by

                      @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

                      @DustinB3403

                      I've got my important media and my "who the heck cares" media.

                      You raid 0 for speed

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403
                        last edited by

                        RAID0 would give you a lot of read/write performance while not caring if you lose a drive (as the data is gone anyways)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • wirestyle22W
                          wirestyle22 @Sparkum
                          last edited by

                          @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

                          @DustinB3403

                          I'd rather lose 1 disk and 2TB versus lose 1 disk and 6TB

                          How many TB do you have that you can't lose?

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403 @Sparkum
                            last edited by

                            @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

                            @DustinB3403

                            I'd rather lose 1 disk and 2TB versus lose 1 disk and 6TB

                            I don't get this concept...

                            RAID0 you'd lose it all, no RAID you'd have no "protection" of a drive failing either.

                            So unless you mean to mirror the drives in a separate mechanism for protection, while not getting any benefit of RAID, you have a backup.

                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Sparkum @wirestyle22
                              last edited by

                              @wirestyle22

                              I'd say 8-10TB

                              wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • wirestyle22W
                                wirestyle22 @Sparkum
                                last edited by wirestyle22

                                @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

                                @wirestyle22

                                I'd say 8-10TB

                                and how much total? Also how quickly are you going to expand?

                                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  Sparkum @DustinB3403
                                  last edited by

                                  @DustinB3403

                                  Well what are we talking here, for me it would be (atleast) 3 2TB drives, so you are saying make 1 giant 6TB raid 0 correct?

                                  So 1 drive dies I lose 6TB

                                  Or are you saying make 3 2TB Raid 0's so that if I lose 1 I only lose 2TB
                                  Can I then make it appear to be one disk though?

                                  And please keep in mind there might just not be a linux thing I dont know.

                                  For example in Windows I have stablebit drive pool pooling my drives so that if I lose 1 drive I only lose the data on that one drive.

                                  wirestyle22W DustinB3403D 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    Sparkum @wirestyle22
                                    last edited by

                                    @wirestyle22

                                    Total (used and unused) I'm sitting at 22TB.

                                    And I'd say I'm expanding fast enough that I felt I needed 22TB, have 6TB free, had prob 12TB+ free 6 months ago.

                                    Offloading some junk to the cloud though currently.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • wirestyle22W
                                      wirestyle22 @Sparkum
                                      last edited by

                                      @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

                                      @DustinB3403

                                      Well what are we talking here, for me it would be (atleast) 3 2TB drives, so you are saying make 1 giant 6TB raid 0 correct?

                                      So 1 drive dies I lose 6TB

                                      Or are you saying make 3 2TB Raid 0's so that if I lose 1 I only lose 2TB
                                      Can I then make it appear to be one disk though?

                                      And please keep in mind there might just not be a linux thing I dont know.

                                      For example in Windows I have stablebit drive pool pooling my drives so that if I lose 1 drive I only lose the data on that one drive.

                                      My thought was if you have 2TB you can't lose out of 10, put everything in a raid 0 and then buy a small NAS backup for the 2 TB.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DustinB3403D
                                        DustinB3403 @Sparkum
                                        last edited by

                                        @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

                                        @DustinB3403

                                        Well what are we talking here, for me it would be (atleast) 3 2TB drives, so you are saying make 1 giant 6TB raid 0 correct?

                                        So 1 drive dies I lose 6TB

                                        Or are you saying make 3 2TB Raid 0's so that if I lose 1 I only lose 2TB
                                        Can I then make it appear to be one disk though?

                                        And please keep in mind there might just not be a linux thing I dont know.

                                        For example in Windows I have stablebit drive pool pooling my drives so that if I lose 1 drive I only lose the data on that one drive.

                                        I'm just trying to understand what you are trying to do.

                                        Without RAID, you won't be able to present multiple disks to any OS (unless it's FakeRAID and Windows) and show it as one drive.

                                        S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • S
                                          Sparkum @DustinB3403
                                          last edited by

                                          @DustinB3403

                                          My initial question was, is there a way to group harddrives in a non raid format. So yes, a fakeraid

                                          DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DustinB3403D
                                            DustinB3403 @Sparkum
                                            last edited by

                                            @Sparkum said in I did a thing, have a quick Linux question:

                                            @DustinB3403

                                            My initial question was, is there a way to group harddrives in a non raid format. So yes, a fakeraid

                                            There is, and FakeRAID is about as useful as RAID0 (if you want to protect the data).

                                            Simply don't use it.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 2 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post