What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?
-
@Carnival-Boy The price for what you are stating as the UK support features in the US is $4500 up front and $500/year. So in five years is $7,000. Three times the cost of XenServer with support, for example. And XenServer charges over time without the financially painful front loading.
-
It's not the UK, Scott. If you take a look at the link I posted, it's standard VMWare support worldwide except the US. Why the US is different, I don't know. It seems weird.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
It's not the UK, Scott. If you take a look at the link I posted, it's standard VMWare support worldwide except the US. Why the US is different, I don't know. It seems weird.
Oh okay, I see. Well that makes a little more sense.
So the question then should be... "what is the upside to Vmware to the SMB in the US?"
-
@Carnival-Boy said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
It's not the UK, Scott. If you take a look at the link I posted, it's standard VMWare support worldwide except the US. Why the US is different, I don't know. It seems weird.
On the link that you sent to me, i don't see what part you are addressing for me to look at. It appears to not mention the Essentials package in any way but only lists support information once you have support, which Essentials (in the US at least) does not include. So given that there is no support to check against, I am not seeing where you see support available for non-US but not the US.
Can you screenshot the relevant part or something?
-
@Carnival-Boy said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
It's not the UK, Scott. If you take a look at the link I posted, it's standard VMWare support worldwide except the US. Why the US is different, I don't know. It seems weird.
If I go to the VMware UK page, it shows the exact same data that I screenshot above for the UK - even the pricing is in USD the same, and it says no support for the UK either.
-
Here is the page that says that UK doesn't get support for Essentials. Maybe you used to and don't any longer?
-
Checked Australia, same deal. US prices, no support.
-
Not sure what you mean by Essentials doesn't include support. You can't buy support in the US? Like I said, I pay $59 a year for support. That's the basic support package as per the link.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
Not sure what you mean by Essentials doesn't include support. You can't buy support in the US? Like I said, I pay $59 a year for support. That's the basic support package as per the link.
Yes, US and UK both allow you to buy support, but that's a separate cost and not part of Essentials. Essentials includes no support itself. If you want support, that is an additional cost above and beyond Essentials.
Basic Support is specifically not included in Essentials but only in Essentials Plus, which starts at $4500.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
Like I said, I pay $59 a year for support. That's the basic support package as per the link.
You are getting quite the deal. The line item for both the US and UK is "required subscription" and does not include support until you pay ten times that amount. It's not a support fee, it's a mandatory fee to keep your systems licensed. If you stop paying it, you aren't allowed to keep running VMware. But it comes with no support. At least not officially. Maybe you got a special one time deal, maybe they supported you on accident, I have no idea. But I can't buy what you have for less than $4500 up front and $500 per year in either the US or the UK.
-
Sorry, I keep misquoting the price. It's not $500/year. It is about $1,000 per year to get Basic support. Double what I was thinking.
-
The pricing and support guide was screenshotted and posted. That's the current one for the US, UK and Australia (and I would guess everywhere else.) That's officially what we are able to get and what I would have to take to a manager to show what they would pay and what support they could count on.
-
If you have a link to how to buy VMware ESXi Essentials with support for cheaper than VMware even lists the mandatory subscription, this is something that we need. That's a tiny fraction of the costs that we see from VMware in any market.
-
For reference, when the new "no support" option became standard there were some questions about it. I've seen VMware clarify this many times that there is no support in Essentials (normally, at least.) Here is a VMware rep clarifying that Essentials has no support directly: https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/393637-vmware-vsphere-essentials-kits-support-subscription-options
-
I think the other issue is convincing others of the benefits of hypervisors like XenServer or Hyper-V. I want to use Hyper-V or Xen for 2 new hosts that will have Citrix XenApp running but convincing management to move from ESXi is a struggle but I think this also comes from our MSP that likes ESXi and pushes that even in the FREE version.
-
I think you're right. The renewal notice for my support contract said "Unlimited support requests. Quick resolutions to technical issues through remote support" and my contract say "Support and Subscription (SnS)", but the small print line details say "Subscription Only".
Carry on, people.
-
@Carnival-Boy said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
I think you're right. The renewal notice for my support contract said "Unlimited support requests. Quick resolutions to technical issues through remote support" and my contract say "Support and Subscription (SnS)", but the small print line details say "Subscription Only".
Carry on, people.
My guess is that this changed around 2013.
-
@hobbit666 said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
I think the other issue is convincing others of the benefits of hypervisors like XenServer or Hyper-V. I want to use Hyper-V or Xen for 2 new hosts that will have Citrix XenApp running but convincing management to move from ESXi is a struggle but I think this also comes from our MSP that likes ESXi and pushes that even in the FREE version.
That bit comes down to getting management to recognize their buyer's agents from their seller's agents. Once they realize that their MSP is really a VAR and is trying to make a quick buck selling them something, it should change their perspective quickly.
Not that VMware is always bad and anyone pushing it is trying to make a quick buck; only that an MSP making money by selling VMware isn't a trustworthy decision maker in this scenario.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
@hobbit666 said in What is the Upside to VMware to the SMB?:
I think the other issue is convincing others of the benefits of hypervisors like XenServer or Hyper-V. I want to use Hyper-V or Xen for 2 new hosts that will have Citrix XenApp running but convincing management to move from ESXi is a struggle but I think this also comes from our MSP that likes ESXi and pushes that even in the FREE version.
That bit comes down to getting management to recognize their buyer's agents from their seller's agents. Once they realize that their MSP is really a VAR and is trying to make a quick buck selling them something, it should change their perspective quickly.
Not that VMware is always bad and anyone pushing it is trying to make a quick buck; only that an MSP making money by selling VMware isn't a trustworthy decision maker in this scenario.
100% Agree - At the moment we are "reviewing" our ESXi farm that currently has a SAN, and we have outgrown it. Every time we talk the instant reaction is NEW SAN with some SSD's for SQL etc etc. I'm thinking no lets look at Hypercoverage or IaaS now
But yeah since I've started here and started to question things the IT manager has been a bit more on my side with thinking
-
Good, solid cost and features analysis can go a long way.
