ServerBear Performance Comparison of Rackspace, Digital Ocean, Linode and Vultr
-
OMG WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!
Linode just took everyone out back and took their lunch money!! They have load balancers too!! (a la Rackspace and Amazone.) Look at that IO capacity!!! And that UNIX Bench! Their single thread was by far the fastest too!
-
@scottalanmiller said:
OMG WE HAVE A WINNER!!!!
Linode just took everyone out back and took their lunch money!! They have load balancers too!! (a la Rackspace and Amazone.) Look at that IO capacity!!! And that UNIX Bench! Their single thread was by far the fastest too!
Wow. That's fantastic.
-
@wirestyle22 said:
Wow. That's fantastic.
I'm so excited. No question that they are by FAR the hardest to use, but who cares. That performance is crazy!!
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Wow. That's fantastic.
I'm so excited. No question that they are by FAR the hardest to use, but who cares. That performance is crazy!!
Rewarded complexity is fine by me
-
Throughout the range, Linode comes in either as cheap or cheaper than everyone else, too. It pretty much tracks Vultr until it outscales them. Then it matches or beats DO.
-
Of additional consideration... Vultr and RS cap out pretty small. DO and Linode make massive single nodes, which is important when we are running epic databases, which we are doing. The growth rate on the database is quite healthy.
-
-
@aaronstuder said:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/01/04/linode_back_at_last_after_ten_days_of_hell/
That's just painful, but have to expect that to happen now and then. Guess I'll start an overnight ping test, see how bad it still is.
Edit: Never mind, don't have the IP address for the Linode.
-
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
-
@travisdh1 said:
Edit: Never mind, don't have the IP address for the Linode.
It's already offline but I will get you a new one privately in a few minutes.
-
Will Mangolassi be moving to Linode?
-
@aaronstuder said:
Will Mongolassi be moving to Linode?
Nope Mongolassi doesn't exist!
-
@aaronstuder said:
Will Mangolassi be moving to Linode?
Yes, going to make an attempt of it.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
This was really interesting.
-
@wrx7m said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
This was really interesting.
Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.
-
@Dashrender said:
@wrx7m said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
This was really interesting.
Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.
Yeah, the scale here is crazy.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
@wrx7m said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
This was really interesting.
Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.
Yeah, the scale here is crazy.
80 GB attack - damn!
-
@scottalanmiller I got busy and never got back to this.
I just cancelled the pings. here are the results.
64 bytes from 172.99.75.133: icmp_seq=34832 ttl=50 time=39.6 ms ^C --- 172.99.75.133 ping statistics --- 34832 packets transmitted, 20406 received, 41% packet loss, time 34860502ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.082/39.183/122.033/2.152 ms [root@keygen ~]#64 bytes from 108.61.151.173: icmp_seq=34830 ttl=54 time=49.9 ms ^C --- 108.61.151.173 ping statistics --- 34830 packets transmitted, 34821 received, 0% packet loss, time 34873888ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.852/47.901/842.335/7.692 ms [root@keygen ~]#64 bytes from 104.236.119.59: icmp_seq=34838 ttl=56 time=48.6 ms ^C --- 104.236.119.59 ping statistics --- 34838 packets transmitted, 34807 received, 0% packet loss, time 34890326ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 48.341/48.750/1051.915/5.427 ms, pipe 2 [root@keygen ~]# -
-
@aaronstuder that would be the Atom processor. Per thread performance is low. You get a lot of memory with that but not much CPU. Great for a lab. Much slower thread performance on physical than the VMs we are testing.
