What am I missing here (Exchange 2010 on server 2012r2)
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Isn't moving to O365 going to be necessary at some point though anyway? Isn't this where technology is going? I'm asking because I honestly don't know.
It's where most things are headed, yes. Necessary might be a strong way to think of it. But the trend is and has been that directly very rapidly.
Thank you.
I strongly word it because my understanding is that LAN won't be as supported as it is today in the future. How far away that is, I have no idea.
-
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Isn't moving to O365 going to be necessary at some point though anyway? Isn't this where technology is going? I'm asking because I honestly don't know.
It's where most things are headed, yes. Necessary might be a strong way to think of it. But the trend is and has been that directly very rapidly.
Thank you.
I strongly word it because my understanding is that LAN won't be as supported as it is today in the future. How far away that is, I have no idea.
Even if you have a traditional LAN, it doesn't mean your Exchange would be treated as a LAN resource, though. Email is inherently LANless by design of being a network to network communications platform.
-
100% and I even stated below I think we chose the wrong plan for our company.
So while we paid $4k/year we were also licensing 20-30 users with Office 2013 but again, hidden costs.Ya, I think if we had gone 43012 = $1440 there would have been a greater chance of us keeping it.
But in the realm of eventually putting lets say 200 people on it, I feel it was an idea that would have died in our organization -
@wirestyle22
necessary no, strongly preferred, yes -
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Isn't moving to O365 going to be necessary at some point though anyway? Isn't this where technology is going? I'm asking because I honestly don't know.
It's where most things are headed, yes. Necessary might be a strong way to think of it. But the trend is and has been that directly very rapidly.
Thank you.
I strongly word it because my understanding is that LAN won't be as supported as it is today in the future. How far away that is, I have no idea.
Even if you have a traditional LAN, it doesn't mean your Exchange would be treated as a LAN resource, though. Email is inherently LANless by design of being a network to network communications platform.
Isn't it more LAN-like than a cloud service? I suppose we could move our exchange server to a data-center and get more guaranteed connections and better power managemenet options/disaster recovery plans, but isn't that one of the benefits of the cloud or am I way off base here?
-
Benefits of the cloud is its worry free, guaranteed 99.99% up time (typically), and maintenance free.
Then yes electricity, redundancy, internet speeds, etc -
@Sparkum said:
Benefits of the cloud is its worry free, guaranteed 99.99% up time (typically), and maintenance free.
Then yes electricity, redundancy, internet speeds, etcThat was my understanding. Thank you for clarifying
-
Strictly form the Exchange side, here are the comparative costs.
Exchange Online Plan 1: 200 * $4 = $800/month * 12 months = $9,600/year.
Exchange 2013 Standard = $655
Exchange 2013 User CAL = $72 * 200 = $14,400You also have to consider The costs for Office and such. but this is just the Exchange numbers.
-
@wirestyle22 said:
Isn't it more LAN-like than a cloud service? I suppose we could move our exchange server to a data-center and get more guaranteed connections and better power managemenet options/disaster recovery plans, but isn't that one of the benefits of the cloud or am I way off base here?
Well that's an advantage of hosted. Critical services should generally already be in a datacenter, in most cases.
But it's not LAN-like. Even on on premises Exchange server behaves as if it was its own thing.
-
@JaredBusch said:
Strictly form the Exchange side, here are the comparative costs.
Exchange Online Plan 1: 200 * $4 = $800/month * 12 months = $9,600/year.
Exchange 2013 Standard = $655
Exchange 2013 User CAL = $72 * 200 = $14,400You also have to consider The costs for Office and such. but this is just the Exchange numbers.
And only the licensing cost. Doesn't include the Windows licensing, hardware costs, storage costs, backup software cost, backup hardware cost, Exchange admin cost, and so forth.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@wirestyle22 said:
Isn't it more LAN-like than a cloud service? I suppose we could move our exchange server to a data-center and get more guaranteed connections and better power managemenet options/disaster recovery plans, but isn't that one of the benefits of the cloud or am I way off base here?
Well that's an advantage of hosted. Critical services should generally already be in a datacenter, in most cases.
But it's not LAN-like. Even on on premises Exchange server behaves as if it was its own thing.
I understand. Thank you!
-
@Dashrender I am planning on migrating to office365 or another hosted exchange service from Exchange 2010 too.
-
For sure but after 5 years...
$50k vs 14k also considering we already have the office licenses, (not 2013 mind you but most of our users are so light on office it doesn't matter)
Trust me, I 100% understand both sides of this, but I'm not the decision maker or the invoice signer.
-
@Sparkum said:
For sure but after 5 years...
The you have to pay for the new licenses, migrate to the new system.... that's when the really big savings of the hosted solution come in.
Plus, don't forget, you need filtering, AV and that stuff and that's always hosted and often $1-$2 per user per month cutting the cost of O365 in half.
-
For sure, the largest kicker is we would NEVER switch all of our users, (we are a retail establishment with hundreds and hundreds of generic email addresses)
We currently have a Barracuda Spam and Firewall so no matter what, that would stay on site and licensed. -
@Sparkum said:
We currently have a Barracuda Spam and Firewall so no matter what, that would stay on site and licensed.
Why would those stay? Wouldn't eliminating those be a top priority?
-
@scottalanmiller As someone that will be migrating soon, are you saying that the av/spam filtering is included in o365 or you have a 3rd party providing services for these?
-
@wrx7m said:
@scottalanmiller As someone that will be migrating soon, are you saying that the av/spam filtering is included in o365 or you have a 3rd party providing services for these?
It's included, it is the largest percentage of the value of the service. It's what makes it impossible to consider an on premises system based on cost. No way to compete.
-
@Sparkum said:
For sure, the largest kicker is we would NEVER switch all of our users, (we are a retail establishment with hundreds and hundreds of generic email addresses)
We currently have a Barracuda Spam and Firewall so no matter what, that would stay on site and licensed.For those generic e-mail addresses, how are you using them? Are they proxy addresses, distribution groups or actual mailboxes?
-
@scottalanmiller Cool. What about backups?
