ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    What Are You Doing Right Now

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Water Closet
    time waster
    88.9k Posts 285 Posters 42.3m Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • stacksofplatesS
      stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      I'm getting very frustrated with these posts. The sheer number of people lacking entry level IT knowledge that then post things as if they have a clue and defend it without the slightest idea what they are talking about is just overwhelming. An entire thread of people who can't identify the basic RAID levels, can't figure out when things are safer or more dangerous, even the vendor is clueless here because he is stuck promoting his RAID 5 product. Then people using it as a platform to show off how little they know of software RAID.

      http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1377183-this-is-why-you-should-stay-away-from-raid-5

      It's like a showcase of how clueless average IT people are. This is really, really basic stuff in this discussion. In a forum with that much misinformation, how can anyone have a useful discussion?

      Scott this pimiento said it's this way so I believe he is correct (yes sarcasm)

      He placed an Raid 0 array on top of 3 raid 5 arrays wich effectively equals Raid 0. Luckily it was raid 5 under there so SOME fault tollerance was preset. He didnt have one array like you said (raid 50) but he had 4 arrays in total there. If you have 8 raid controllers (Operating system will see that as 8 hard drives) and you place them all in software Raid 0 like he did, you're pushing your luck with every minute. Faul tollerance is 0 raid controllers in that case.

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • stacksofplatesS
        stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        I'm getting very frustrated with these posts. The sheer number of people lacking entry level IT knowledge that then post things as if they have a clue and defend it without the slightest idea what they are talking about is just overwhelming. An entire thread of people who can't identify the basic RAID levels, can't figure out when things are safer or more dangerous, even the vendor is clueless here because he is stuck promoting his RAID 5 product. Then people using it as a platform to show off how little they know of software RAID.

        http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1377183-this-is-why-you-should-stay-away-from-raid-5

        It's like a showcase of how clueless average IT people are. This is really, really basic stuff in this discussion. In a forum with that much misinformation, how can anyone have a useful discussion?

        So is Joerg really from WD or from SW? I don't know any of the SW people so I can't tell. But if he is from WD, that's really bad.

        Btw, this setup is not RAID 50, this is 3 x RAID 5 stripped in one huge partition with a blown controller.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
          last edited by

          @johnhooks said:

          He placed an Raid 0 array on top of 3 raid 5 arrays wich effectively equals Raid 0. Luckily it was raid 5 under there so SOME fault tollerance was preset. He didnt have one array like you said (raid 50) but he had 4 arrays in total there. If you have 8 raid controllers (Operating system will see that as 8 hard drives) and you place them all in software Raid 0 like he did, you're pushing your luck with every minute. Faul tollerance is 0 raid controllers in that case.

          That's just a very long winded way of saying RAID 50.

          stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
            last edited by

            @johnhooks said:

            @scottalanmiller said:

            I'm getting very frustrated with these posts. The sheer number of people lacking entry level IT knowledge that then post things as if they have a clue and defend it without the slightest idea what they are talking about is just overwhelming. An entire thread of people who can't identify the basic RAID levels, can't figure out when things are safer or more dangerous, even the vendor is clueless here because he is stuck promoting his RAID 5 product. Then people using it as a platform to show off how little they know of software RAID.

            http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1377183-this-is-why-you-should-stay-away-from-raid-5

            It's like a showcase of how clueless average IT people are. This is really, really basic stuff in this discussion. In a forum with that much misinformation, how can anyone have a useful discussion?

            So is Joerg really from WD or from SW? I don't know any of the SW people so I can't tell. But if he is from WD, that's really bad.

            Btw, this setup is not RAID 50, this is 3 x RAID 5 stripped in one huge partition with a blown controller.

            He's from Western Digital Germany.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • dafyreD
              dafyre
              last edited by

              Wow... The interwebs have gone silent all of a sudden! gasp The horror!

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                I was in teh shower.

                BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • BRRABillB
                  BRRABill @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  I was in teh shower.

                  For 3 hours? 😉

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                    last edited by

                    @BRRABill said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    I was in teh shower.

                    For 3 hours? 😉

                    I like to be clean.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • stacksofplatesS
                      stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @johnhooks said:

                      He placed an Raid 0 array on top of 3 raid 5 arrays wich effectively equals Raid 0. Luckily it was raid 5 under there so SOME fault tollerance was preset. He didnt have one array like you said (raid 50) but he had 4 arrays in total there. If you have 8 raid controllers (Operating system will see that as 8 hard drives) and you place them all in software Raid 0 like he did, you're pushing your luck with every minute. Faul tollerance is 0 raid controllers in that case.

                      That's just a very long winded way of saying RAID 50.

                      I just noticed you commented on this haha. I was just pointing out another person now knowing how that works.

                      He didnt have one array like you said (raid 50) but he had 4 arrays in total there.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • dafyreD
                        dafyre
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller might could look in over here and make some recommendations...

                        http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1388358-disaster-recovery-redundancy-and-the-small-business?source=homepage-feed

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          Just back home from an amazing night out. Went down to the beach on the Aegean and went to the Living Room Lounge and Cafe in Rethymno and had awesome food. Great crowd. This is very much a college town. Even with no tourist the place is packed on a Tuesday night.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403
                            last edited by

                            Very nice.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              It was great. And so cheap. In Nicaragua that dinner would have been $120 easy. In the US, $150. In Greece, $30!!

                              DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                It was great. And so cheap. In Nicaragua that dinner would have been $120 easy. In the US, $150. In Greece, $30!!

                                In Greece I would expect everything to be cheap...

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @dafyre
                                  last edited by

                                  @dafyre said:

                                  @scottalanmiller might could look in over here and make some recommendations...

                                  http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1388358-disaster-recovery-redundancy-and-the-small-business?source=homepage-feed

                                  Hey, that is @garak0410 why didn't he ask over here?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • DustinB3403D
                                    DustinB3403
                                    last edited by

                                    Exporting my functional VM's from my crapbox to my whitebox.

                                    Similar build to what it was before, but at least I'm running. RAM has been RMA's, replacement RAM Ordered.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • brianlittlejohnB
                                      brianlittlejohn
                                      last edited by

                                      Calling it a day!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        Just had new functionality added to our Scale cluster. About to go do some playing.

                                        dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                        • dafyreD
                                          dafyre @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said:

                                          Just had new functionality added to our Scale cluster. About to go do some playing.

                                          The rest of us want to play!

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            It's nearly midnight here. Time for a Metaxa and tonic.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 833
                                            • 834
                                            • 835
                                            • 836
                                            • 837
                                            • 4443
                                            • 4444
                                            • 835 / 4444
                                            • First post
                                              Last post