ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    So the Chinese Government is about as sharp as a box of shipping peanuts....

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    8 Posts 4 Posters 748 Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403
      last edited by

      New Chinese law takes aim at encryption

      To summarize, the government passed a law requiring some way to decrypt encrypted information. ...

      Grand times we live in..

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        A new law passed by China's Parliament on Sunday requires technology companies to assist the government in decrypting content, a provision that the country maintains is modeled after Western law.

        Xinhua quoted Li Shouwei, of the National People's Congress Standing Committee legislative affairs commission, as saying the law doesn't require technology companies to install "backdoors,"

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Basically the west set the standard very low and the Chinese did not have much to live up to.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • coliverC
            coliver
            last edited by

            I was reading a response from the US Government... basically it said "do what we say and not what we do."

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @coliver
              last edited by

              @coliver said:

              I was reading a response from the US Government... basically it said "do what we say and not what we do."

              Well and officially China is not requiring backdoors. Can the US say the same thing?

              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @coliver said:

                I was reading a response from the US Government... basically it said "do what we say and not what we do."

                Well and officially China is not requiring backdoors. Can the US say the same thing?

                Well not yet at least, but that is was the talking heads want.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403
                  last edited by

                  What doesn't make sense about the topic here, is that the very same people wanting to decrypt these communications for the purposes of targeting terrorist, would also use the very same ability to hold you at ransom for their own gain.

                  coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • coliverC
                    coliver @DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    @DustinB3403 said:

                    What doesn't make sense about the topic here, is that the very same people wanting to decrypt these communications for the purposes of targeting terrorist, would also use the very same ability to hold you at ransom for their own gain.

                    Politicians passing laws for personal gain? Say it isn't so!

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                    • 1 / 1
                    • First post
                      Last post