ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Need Vista Home OEM image

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    vistaoem
    65 Posts 13 Posters 13.7k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender
      last edited by

      Alright, the ISO from gjacobse worked.

      Currently downloading and installing SP1 and SP2 - this is a RTM disk. many hours of waiting ahead of me.

      gjacobseG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • gjacobseG
        gjacobse @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said:

        Alright, the ISO from gjacobse worked.

        Currently downloading and installing SP1 and SP2 - this is a RTM disk. many hours of waiting ahead of me.

        Glad it worked. It's been a while since I installed Vista,.. could you not skip SP1 and go to SP2?

        PSX_DefectorP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          In theory you are supposed to be able to go directly to SP2.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said:

            In theory you are supposed to be able to go directly to SP2.

            I always have. I have not restored one in a couple years, but I did it that way last time.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • PSX_DefectorP
              PSX_Defector @gjacobse
              last edited by

              @gjacobse said:

              @Dashrender said:

              Alright, the ISO from gjacobse worked.

              Currently downloading and installing SP1 and SP2 - this is a RTM disk. many hours of waiting ahead of me.

              Glad it worked. It's been a while since I installed Vista,.. could you not skip SP1 and go to SP2?

              Yes, you can. No need to install a previous service pack. The most recent is sufficient. You could do that on NT4.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @PSX_Defector
                last edited by

                @PSX_Defector said:

                @gjacobse said:

                @Dashrender said:

                Alright, the ISO from gjacobse worked.

                Currently downloading and installing SP1 and SP2 - this is a RTM disk. many hours of waiting ahead of me.

                Glad it worked. It's been a while since I installed Vista,.. could you not skip SP1 and go to SP2?

                Yes, you can. No need to install a previous service pack. The most recent is sufficient. You could do that on NT4.

                Not quite. You could do it to a point but to get to the final release of SP6a you had to install SP4, then the Release Pack, then SP6a. Took three updates to get to the last one. But you did not need SP1, 2 or 3 to do it. And SP5 was not needed.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  With Vista I thought you Had to install SP1 first because of the major changes from RTM to SP1?

                  I'll have to confirm that tomorrow.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    I was pretty sure.

                    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/948465

                    Windows Vista Service Pack 1 (SP1) is a prerequisite for installing SP2 in Windows Vista. If you use Windows Update or the Automatic Update feature in Windows Vista, you will not be offered the option to install SP2 until you first install SP1.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      Okay, that's weird and goes explicitly against MS' stated naming convention. They stated that the term SP used meant that it included the early SPs.

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        Okay, that's weird and goes explicitly against MS' stated naming convention. They stated that the term SP used meant that it included the early SPs.

                        Is it any weirder than the NT 4.0 setup you wrote about above?

                        The changes were so drastic in SP1 that it barely resembled the RTM.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @Dashrender said:

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          Okay, that's weird and goes explicitly against MS' stated naming convention. They stated that the term SP used meant that it included the early SPs.

                          Is it any weirder than the NT 4.0 setup you wrote about above?

                          The changes were so drastic in SP1 that it barely resembled the RTM.

                          Yes, because the terms were not explicitly to mean that until after NT.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 3
                          • 4
                          • 4 / 4
                          • First post
                            Last post