ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Cannot decide between 1U servers for growing company

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    246 Posts 18 Posters 138.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ntoxicatorN
      ntoxicator
      last edited by gjacobse

      UPDATE

      Oracle just got back to me on Pricing. Made me puke

      10K PER server for a F*** simple 1U box? what f[moderated] is going on with this market, have I completely lost touch?

      scottalanmillerS coliverC 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        @ntoxicator said:

        Scott made a comment on Xen Server with HA-Lizard

        But wouldnt all that storage replication STILL be handled over 1Gbe backbone??!

        Yes, ONLY way to avoid that is to abandon HA and move on. HA requires certain things that you can't get away from even if you improve the architecture.

        Our Scale cluster has a dedicated 10GigE SAN network, for example, to overcome that. Huge throughput and sharing nothing with other functions.

        It doesn't have to. @ntoxicator was talking about installing a 10 GB network for replication.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @ntoxicator
          last edited by

          @ntoxicator said:

          Still 100% confused on local replicated storage.

          Which aspects? Think of it like SAN. If you want HA SAN you need a replicated cluster of SAN. If you do that, the replication handles one point of fragility but you still need to buy multiple SAN devices, have a network to connect them to the compute nodes, etc. If you move from SAN to DAS you can eliminate some of the networking complexity meaning you get even safer and less complicated, but you still have extra devices to fail and more cost.

          Take this to the next level, move the DAS from external to internal and have it be part of the compute devices. You lower cost by removing the extra boxes and reduce risk by reducing the number of parts.

          Each move towards local increases reliability and lowers latency and increases bandwidth while lowering cost. It's all win.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • ntoxicatorN
            ntoxicator
            last edited by

            Right. Future plans was to do 10Gbe backbone for ONLY the Hypervisor Nodes & the NAS/SAN

            All other network traffic (workstations, phones) - would be handled by the 1GigE network switching

            I would just inter-connect the 1GigE network to the 10GigE network to be able to talk and have access to those devices.

            Ofcourse I know local storage would be faster.

            Just looking for cost-effective.

            As you know I was looking at 2X Synology rackmount 12-disk units (replication - HA setup). and then just Hypervisor nodes.

            But damn.. Oracle hit me with 10k per 1U server. what the hell

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @ntoxicator
              last edited by gjacobse

              @ntoxicator said:

              UPDATE

              Oracle just got back to me on Pricing. Made me puke

              10K PER server for a F*** simple 1U box? what f[moderated] is going on with this market, have I completely lost touch?

              It's that you have moved into a new Oracle hardware world. They don't make servers for generic consumption like this any more. They still make great stuff. But they are focused on vertical integration for Oracle workloads. I don't look at them for AMD64 platform stuff anymore. It's Sparc only now, and I never get to work with people wanting that size of RISC gear these days.

              I've got a "new" big Sparc RISC server slated for our lab, though. Hoping to get that bought and racked in 2016. Large scale Solaris system.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                marcinozga @ntoxicator
                last edited by

                @ntoxicator said:

                But wouldnt all that storage replication STILL be handled over 1Gbe backbone??!

                Dual port 10Gbit ethernet cards cost as low as $400-$500.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • coliverC
                  coliver @ntoxicator
                  last edited by gjacobse

                  @ntoxicator said:

                  UPDATE

                  Oracle just got back to me on Pricing. Made me puke

                  10K PER server for a F*** simple 1U box? what f[moderated] is going on with this market, have I completely lost touch?

                  Check out http://www.xbyte.com/.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @ntoxicator
                    last edited by

                    @ntoxicator said:

                    As you know I was looking at 2X Synology rackmount 12-disk units (replication - HA setup). and then just Hypervisor nodes.

                    But damn.. Oracle hit me with 10k per 1U server. what the hell

                    That's four or five total nodes. How much total storage needs?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ntoxicatorN
                      ntoxicator
                      last edited by

                      Right, which I was prospecting to have 3 large Hypervisor nodes to handle workload.. but might need to scale larger to handle the future

                      again, company plans to have 400-500 employee's by year 2020.

                      Total storage. I would guesstimate would grow larger than 5TB in 2+ years.

                      scottalanmillerS coliverC J 4 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @ntoxicator
                        last edited by

                        @ntoxicator said:

                        Total storage. I would guesstimate would grow larger than 5TB in 2+ years.

                        That size is easy to handle. No problem there.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • coliverC
                          coliver @ntoxicator
                          last edited by

                          @ntoxicator said:

                          Right, which I was prospecting to have 3 large Hypervisor nodes to handle workload.. but might need to scale larger to handle the future

                          again, company plans to have 400-500 employee's by year 2020.

                          Total storage. I would guesstimate would grow larger than 5TB in 2+ years.

                          That really isn't that much. You could look at a middle of the road R720xd and get several times that amount in just one server.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • ntoxicatorN
                            ntoxicator
                            last edited by

                            But all these 400 future employee's using a RDP wrapper to launch their software? Similar to thin-client. (2X Application Server)

                            I do not install the needed customer software on the employee's workstations. Much easier to handle. I'd be putting out even more fires on daily basis.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • ntoxicatorN
                              ntoxicator
                              last edited by

                              its Billing Related software.. medical billing. as FYI

                              So we deal with numerous different EHR/PM systems. One day looking to be able to streamline to one central software. This is a challenge

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • J
                                Jason Banned @ntoxicator
                                last edited by

                                @ntoxicator said:

                                Right, which I was prospecting to have 3 large Hypervisor nodes to handle workload.. but might need to scale larger to handle the future

                                again, company plans to have 400-500 employee's by year 2020.

                                Total storage. I would guesstimate would grow larger than 5TB in 2+ years.

                                That's Pretty tiny really.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @ntoxicator
                                  last edited by

                                  @ntoxicator said:

                                  again, company plans to have 400-500 employee's by year 2020.

                                  Long term growth is actually a spot where hyperconverged solutions will normally shine. They have much better growth paths in most cases. With the Synology approach, for example, you will be at your maximum storage performance (your main bottleneck) on day one and as you grow you will have no good performance growth path outside of ripping and replacing. Going with something like Scale or similar HC paths you grow simply by adding a node. So you could start "small" today meeting today's needs and only buy more as needed in the future so only investing when additional capacity is needed which both puts off the purchase to save money (time-value of money) and reduces risk by only buying capacity when it is needed, not buying it and risking it never being needed. The HC approach grows your storage (capacity AND performance) while you grow compute in lock step so you don't get stuck having to rip and replace to upgrade your bottleneck.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ntoxicatorN
                                    ntoxicator
                                    last edited by

                                    @Jason said:

                                    400-500 employee's by year 2020.

                                    But right now, honestly. I'm not certain of what I can 100% project for storage needs 3-5 years. I can just take a look and guess at the storage growth on a monthly basis and calculate there.

                                    As using roaming profiles + company shares and other misc. data on network.

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @ntoxicator
                                      last edited by

                                      @ntoxicator said:

                                      But all these 400 future employee's using a RDP wrapper to launch their software? Similar to thin-client. (2X Application Server)

                                      They are located down the street from my house. I've been out drinking with them many times.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ntoxicatorN
                                        ntoxicator
                                        last edited by

                                        Tell Chris Dill hello (If in Texas?)

                                        Yeah before 2X was over-sea's... but Parallels bought them out.

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @ntoxicator
                                          last edited by

                                          @ntoxicator said:

                                          Tell Chris Dill hello (If in Texas?)

                                          Yeah before 2X was over-sea's... but Parallels bought them out.

                                          Yeah, Dallas. But I'm the one overseas now. I'm in Texas this month for the holiday but in Galveston. Was living in Nicaragua until a week ago. Moving to Greece in a few weeks. Just here visiting for the moment.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • ntoxicatorN
                                            ntoxicator
                                            last edited by

                                            Busy man!!! 🙂

                                            Good stuff.

                                            You're right on about your concerns about growth and up-scaling . I really like what Scale has to offer.

                                            As yes, I would be limited to Synology Rackstation NAS... As RAID-10 array i CANNOT add more disks for additional storage. So that means I cannot grow the volumes any larger than the current 'shelf'

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 12
                                            • 13
                                            • 6 / 13
                                            • First post
                                              Last post