ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Removing shared storage from VMWare environment

    IT Discussion
    6
    43
    17.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said:

      @donaldlandru said:

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @donaldlandru said:

      The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

      Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

      200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

      Why does 200w seem so low?

      That feels very low. You've got dual procs I assume, that's normally over 200W alone. Then the PSU and UPS overhead. The power of the SSDs, memory, fans, etc. It adds up. Can't imagine getting in under 300-400W.

      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        @Dashrender said:

        @donaldlandru said:

        @scottalanmiller said:

        @donaldlandru said:

        The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

        Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

        200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

        Why does 200w seem so low?

        That feels very low. You've got dual procs I assume, that's normally over 200W alone. Then the PSU and UPS overhead. The power of the SSDs, memory, fans, etc. It adds up. Can't imagine getting in under 300-400W.

        Currently he has 2 or no drives in the server, but that will change when he adds the SSDs. So I suppose it's possible with a single Proc and no drives.

        scottalanmillerS donaldlandruD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said:

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @Dashrender said:

          @donaldlandru said:

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @donaldlandru said:

          The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

          Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

          200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

          Why does 200w seem so low?

          That feels very low. You've got dual procs I assume, that's normally over 200W alone. Then the PSU and UPS overhead. The power of the SSDs, memory, fans, etc. It adds up. Can't imagine getting in under 300-400W.

          Currently he has 2 or no drives in the server, but that will change when he adds the SSDs. So I suppose it's possible with a single Proc and no drives.

          But a single proc and no drives isn't what he'd be running 🙂

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            And 128GB of RAM alone draws a bit.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • donaldlandruD
              donaldlandru @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said:

              @donaldlandru said:

              @scottalanmiller said:

              @donaldlandru said:

              The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

              Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

              200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

              Why does 200w seem so low?

              With the assumption of 100% to the psu (450 watts) we are at just shy of $500 year for power which is noteworthy

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @donaldlandru
                last edited by

                @donaldlandru said:

                @Dashrender said:

                @donaldlandru said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                @donaldlandru said:

                The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

                Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

                200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

                Why does 200w seem so low?

                With the assumption of 100% to the psu (450 watts) we are at just shy of $500 year for power which is noteworthy

                Only a single PSU?

                DashrenderD donaldlandruD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @donaldlandru said:

                  @Dashrender said:

                  @donaldlandru said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @donaldlandru said:

                  The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

                  Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

                  200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

                  Why does 200w seem so low?

                  With the assumption of 100% to the psu (450 watts) we are at just shy of $500 year for power which is noteworthy

                  Only a single PSU?

                  Maybe you go single PSU when you are looking at two servers.

                  If you go to a single server, I'd double it up if possible.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • donaldlandruD
                    donaldlandru @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @donaldlandru said:

                    @Dashrender said:

                    @donaldlandru said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @donaldlandru said:

                    The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

                    Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

                    200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

                    Why does 200w seem so low?

                    With the assumption of 100% to the psu (450 watts) we are at just shy of $500 year for power which is noteworthy

                    Only a single PSU?

                    Redundant PSU, but it would be foolish (and not sure if even possible) to exceed the limit of one supply

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @donaldlandru
                      last edited by

                      @donaldlandru said:

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @donaldlandru said:

                      @Dashrender said:

                      @donaldlandru said:

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @donaldlandru said:

                      The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

                      Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

                      200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

                      Why does 200w seem so low?

                      With the assumption of 100% to the psu (450 watts) we are at just shy of $500 year for power which is noteworthy

                      Only a single PSU?

                      Redundant PSU, but it would be foolish (and not sure if even possible) to exceed the limit of one supply

                      Absolutely, but the second one draws power when not in use. Not a ton, but some.

                      donaldlandruD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • donaldlandruD
                        donaldlandru @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @donaldlandru said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @donaldlandru said:

                        @Dashrender said:

                        @donaldlandru said:

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @donaldlandru said:

                        The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

                        Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

                        200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

                        Why does 200w seem so low?

                        With the assumption of 100% to the psu (450 watts) we are at just shy of $500 year for power which is noteworthy

                        Only a single PSU?

                        Redundant PSU, but it would be foolish (and not sure if even possible) to exceed the limit of one supply

                        Absolutely, but the second one draws power when not in use. Not a ton, but some.

                        My power consumption comes from both looking the my apc pdus and using a kill a watt meter before sizing the UPS.

                        I've noticed mine automatically load balances on the PSU at about 50%

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • donaldlandruD
                          donaldlandru @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @Dashrender said:

                          @scottalanmiller said:

                          @donaldlandru said:

                          • Being 24/7 means I can't drop the whole thing for maintenance.

                          How much maintenance do you do? What is the annual downtime caused by VMware? Only VMware and hardware maintenance is assisted by having the second server.

                          Assuming a non DFRS file server, that would be assisted by this as well.

                          @donaldlandru , you said you have 7 servers. can't you install a DC on one of those? Are any of those virtualized or are they all bare metal?

                          2 servers are client owned hardware we have zero control over. I believe these are KVM.

                          2 more are the servers on topic here

                          Finally 3 servers are the "development" silo. With resource reservations I could put a domain controller and possibly a couple other services as well. Every resource used here detracts from revenue that can be generated from box, not that the business is keeping track but I am.

                          So yes I could use this for limited services

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • donaldlandruD
                            donaldlandru @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @Dashrender said:

                            @donaldlandru said:

                            @scottalanmiller said:

                            @donaldlandru said:

                            The UPS and power do come into play but at 200 watts (one server in question) is a small piece of the pie

                            Size of the pie can be misleading. Absolute cost is what would matter in this instance.

                            200w 24/7 @ $0.12 KWh is $211/annually

                            Why does 200w seem so low?

                            That feels very low. You've got dual procs I assume, that's normally over 200W alone. Then the PSU and UPS overhead. The power of the SSDs, memory, fans, etc. It adds up. Can't imagine getting in under 300-400W.

                            Currently he has 2 or no drives in the server, but that will change when he adds the SSDs. So I suppose it's possible with a single Proc and no drives.

                            One of the drives I am looking at has information I think are not correct. https://www.sandisk.com/home/ssd/extreme-pro-ssd claims .15watts while active. The Samsung data center model is the other one which claims 3.4watts while active. Assuming the 3.4 that is 28 watts per server added

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              SSDs save a TON on power over Winchester drives. That's for sure.

                              donaldlandruD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • donaldlandruD
                                donaldlandru @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said:

                                SSDs save a TON on power over Winchester drives. That's for sure.

                                I agree there. I'd have to look it up but willing to bet taking out the two 15k, adding the ssd will still be a net power savings

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1
                                • 2
                                • 3
                                • 2 / 3
                                • First post
                                  Last post