ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. Categories
    3. IT Discussion
    Log in to post
    Load new posts
    • Recently Replied
    • Recently Created
    • Most Posts
    • Most Votes
    • Most Views
    • H

      Server Setup for Legal Firm

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      51
      0 Votes
      51 Posts
      5k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @JaredBusch said in Server Setup for Legal Firm:

      As this is a design still, I would plan to deploy with Windows 2019 being released.

      Unless something goes super critical and unexpected requires an immediate deployment.

      I agree, plan for 2019, wait till it releases. There is no reasonable chance that this project will move so fast that 2019 won't be available again before it's a problem.

    • guyinpvG

      Can we force drivers to install any more in Windows?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      14
      0 Votes
      14 Posts
      2k Views
      M

      @guyinpv said in Can we force drivers to install any more in Windows?:

      @marcinozga said in Can we force drivers to install any more in Windows?:

      @guyinpv I had similar issues with certain USB dongle, on Intel USB controllers, after upgrading to Windows 10. I had a PCIE USB controller lying around, non-Intel chip, and that allowed me to install drivers. If you have a spare controller, it's worth a try.

      It's not a controller, it's a dual DVD duplicator/printer device.

      I know that, but from your screenshots it looks like that duplicator is USB device. What I'm suggesting is connecting it to non-Intel USB controller.

    • 1

      Documenting rack, servers, drives, CPU, RAM etc

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      11
      0 Votes
      11 Posts
      1k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @stacksofplates said in Documenting rack, servers, drives, CPU, RAM etc:

      @dbeato said in Documenting rack, servers, drives, CPU, RAM etc:

      I use https://www.draw.io/ and I know a tool that @stacksofplates recommended for Cloud Diagrams.

      Draw.io recently implemented one that looks almost identical to the one I was using so I've been playing with that. The other was cloudcraft.co.

      For rack diagrams, phpIPAM isnt too bad. And you get the benefit of IPAM software with it.

      Draw.io is in NextCloud too.

    • IRJI

      Fedora 28 vs Ubuntu 18.04 benchmarks

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      1
      1 Votes
      1 Posts
      171 Views
      No one has replied
    • JaredBuschJ

      What makes people want IPSEC at line speed

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved ipsec speed
      20
      1 Votes
      20 Posts
      2k Views
      DonahueD

      @Dashrender said in What makes people want IPSEC at line speed:

      You're 10 miles apart, any chance for a site to site wireless link?

      OK so making them split between some things local and some remote - why not move them 100% remote? Give the users a full RDS desktop, and have them completely stop using their local system?

      1 Gb connection for CAD is still going to be an issue in my mind - I don't really see this solution being better, but who knows, you might get lucky.

      What is your end goal for backups? If it's to continue taking tapes to the bank, why not just pick up two tapes/drives, whatever, one from each site and deliver them to the bank instead of copying over the WAN?

      no wireless without large towers unfortunately, I looked into it before settling on what we did, but I didnt want to try and deal with renting space on someone else's tower. It was getting intimidating and that plan would have been probably more than I could have pulled off.

      I am not sure a full RDS desktop would work under the CAD load, and I know it is not allowed under autodesk licencing without getting Citrix involved.

      In theory, the 1gbps WAN should be similar to the 1gbps LAN, at least that was my thought. I realize now that latency may still be an issue, but it has only been in place for maybe 2 months. Time will tell if that is the long term solution.

      For backups, I have been and currently am doing everything from my location, which is now the HQ. I am backing up roughly ~600GB onto a 1TB external SSD via usb3. I've got somewhere between 6-8TB of total data that I would like to backup, but I had neither the space nor the time to get that all onto a single device that I could take offsite. This forced me to have to choose what to backup, because of lack of anyone higher than me that could/would give me a solid business policy to follow. I don't like being responsible for deciding what does and what doesn't make it into these offsite backups. One problem I am running into is that the person giving me the requirement for offsite backups (the CEO) has no clue what there even is to backup in the first place, because no one here (with a few possible exceptions) can even understand this stuff. I had a conversation just yesterday with him about wanting some direction on how long he wanted to retain backups, and if he wanted that retention done onsite or offsite. He couldn't really give me an answer, he just wants the "drawings" to be backed up "forever". In the end, I basically talked him into officially telling me to do what I had planned on doing in the first place, just so that we had "officially" talked about it. That is probably off topic though.

      Current: Like I said, we are currently backing up 600GB worth of files to a single usb SSD that I rotate out on a weekly basis. Before the IPsec was in place, it took ~150 hours to complete, which since they were weekly backups, took basically the entire week. Now they are completing in ~50 hours, but I am still pulling individual files across the WAN.

      My plan at this point is to move everything over to a single new host at my HQ. This host will be running local SSD's, see https://mangolassi.it/topic/18201/large-or-small-raid-5-with-ssd. I've got two existing hosts (I picked one up along the way) that will be repurposed once the new host is in place. One will become a veeam host (it will be getting new storage), and the other will become an empty host used only for restores. All three hosts will be on a new 10G network, and the veeam host will be getting a tape drive (most likely, see https://mangolassi.it/topic/18209/adding-tape-drive). By using LTO-7 tapes, I can backup literally everything I have, and take those offsite. I am going to backing up to disk on the veeam host, and then copying those to tape. I am also going to be copying my backups across to my branch site. With the new setup, I should be able to do the offsite copy job in a matter of hours. So, I will have 4 copies of the data, 1 production, 2 onsite backups, and 1 offsite backup. I will also be able to run everything from veeam instead of trying to mix that with individual files.

      I still need to decide on how much storage to give said veeam host, but it seems challenging to determine how much each backup requires in the way of storage space, especially since I am deduping mine now using windows server.

    • DustinB3403D

      Find the character break - sh script

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved osx apple shell shell scripting error
      28
      0 Votes
      28 Posts
      4k Views
      DustinB3403D

      @marcinozga said in Find the character break - sh script:

      @DustinB3403 you need to source .bash_profile after changing it, so bash picks up modified file. Either

      source ~/.bash_profile

      or

      . ~/.bash_profile

      Thanks for that, I was actually sorting out that bit as you posted.

      Short of setting up a few printers via the script I'm back in working order.

    • I

      Windows 10 Home > Pro upgrade via MS Store

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      2
      0 Votes
      2 Posts
      436 Views
      JaredBuschJ

      @i3 said in Windows 10 Home > Pro upgrade via MS Store:

      Had a user purchase Windows 10 Pro upgrade through the MS Store so no key was given. We recently did a fresh install and the computer shows Home, I logged the user in with the same account that was used to purchase the upgrade but still will not upgrade to Pro. Anyone else run into this issue and how to resolve?

      Reinstall selecting Pro during the install, it should still activate.

    • NerdyDadN

      Unnecessary packages?

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved fedora 29
      5
      0 Votes
      5 Posts
      604 Views
      travisdh1T

      @JaredBusch said in Unnecessary packages?:

      @NerdyDad said in Unnecessary packages?:

      Okay, then I'll just hold on to it. Not like its taking up any more space than necessary. Thanks

      Fedora only keeps 3 versions by default.

      I'm not sure what CentOS 7 does now, but Cent OS 6 used to keep them all.

      So does Ubuntu.

      Keeping them all was highly annoying when /boot had to be it's own partition. That's been quite a while, thankfully.

    • WLS-ITGuyW

      ISO Wordpress Developer

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      3
      1 Votes
      3 Posts
      274 Views
      WLS-ITGuyW

      @scottalanmiller said in ISO Wordpress Developer:

      Designer... as in someone who uses WP to make websites?

      Or a Deverloper... as in someone who writes code on top of Wordpress for custom "app" functionality there?

      Developer.

    • thwrT

      Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Pro (ERPro-8) IPsec performance

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Solved ubiquiti ipsec vpn
      4
      0 Votes
      4 Posts
      5k Views
      DonahueD

      @scottalanmiller for the sake of this thread, the link shows both ERL and ERPro

    • gjacobseG

      So I built: Pi-hole

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved so i built how to pi-hole vultr
      35
      2 Votes
      35 Posts
      5k Views
      BRRABillB

      @travisdh1 said in So I built: Pi-hole:

      @BRRABill said in So I built: Pi-hole:

      Where is @scottalanmiller to chime in that isn't the purpose of DNS?

      πŸ™‚

      Careful, sounds like he's already infected you!

      Yes but I can't yell at people as good as him.

    • scottalanmillerS

      Why I See UTMs As Generally Bad in the Current Market

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved utm firewall security ngfw networking router
      35
      3 Votes
      35 Posts
      6k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @Donahue said in Why I See UTMs As Generally Bad in the Current Market:

      @scottalanmiller said in Why I See UTMs As Generally Bad in the Current Market:

      @Donahue said in Why I See UTMs As Generally Bad in the Current Market:

      The reason we went with Fortigate over an Edge router, is that the Edge router couldn't do the IPsec bandwidth we were trying to hit. But mine is an NGFW with UTM bundled in. Could there been some other product that I dont know of that would have been better in our case?

      ERL does nearly half of what you need...

      https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/ERL-Performance-Testing-with-IPSec-VPN/m-p/1053799#M44593

      ER and ERPro are so much more powerful. The ER Pro has 2x the CPU power, and 4x the RAM. We'd expect it to be able to saturate your lines no problem. Of course that is "expect", but based on the ERL speeds, and that they run the same code, there is little doubt that it can push IPSec over 1Gig speeds.

      https://dl.ubnt.com/datasheets/edgemax/EdgeRouter_DS.pdf

      Your link is what convinced me not to use the ER pro. the Pro's will only do <500 mbps at full capacity, its in the link you posted.

      Where in it?

      Oh, I see. he mentions ER Pro in another post, then posts them without stating what they are in a thread on ERLs. VERY confusing.

    • wirestyle22W

      Ansible 2.4.2.0 on CentOS 7--ping module isn't working

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved ansible
      33
      0 Votes
      33 Posts
      5k Views
      stacksofplatesS

      @wirestyle22 said in Ansible 2.4.2.0 on CentOS 7--ping module isn't working:

      @stacksofplates That's pretty incredible. Any advice on things I should attempt to set up right now for learning purposes?

      A big benefit is Ansible Galaxy. Look over how everyone sets up their stuff. That will give you good ideas on what to try and how to start writing stuff.

    • dbeatoD

      Microsoft Office New ODT Customization Tool

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved odt microsoft office microsoft
      3
      0 Votes
      3 Posts
      738 Views
      dbeatoD

      @black3dynamite said in Microsoft Office New ODT Customization Tool:

      So they retire it but provides us with a preview?

      Yeah 😞 it is counter productive in my opinion.

    • DustinB3403D

      Brew.sh retry failed installations

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved brew osx mac apple setup
      8
      3 Votes
      8 Posts
      2k Views
      DustinB3403D

      Now I'm getting Unexpected end of File

      FML. . . what changed!

    • wirestyle22W

      Icon disappears after enabling Nextcloud Theming

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      7
      0 Votes
      7 Posts
      481 Views
      wirestyle22W

      @scottalanmiller said in Icon disappears after enabling Nextcloud Theming:

      @wirestyle22 said in Icon disappears after enabling Nextcloud Theming:

      @scottalanmiller That's not how it has worked historically

      No, but it didn't used to have themes, either.

      They've had it for awhile. It's an app

    • DashrenderD

      Connectwise - disable mapping admin's printer into session

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      4
      2 Votes
      4 Posts
      721 Views
      DashrenderD

      @dbeato said in Connectwise - disable mapping admin's printer into session:

      Saw this:
      https://docs.connectwise.com/ConnectWise_Control_Documentation/Technical_support_bulletins/Printers_stuck_on_remote_machines

      yep, that's the issue!

    • dave247D

      Are VLANs Appropriate Here

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      17
      0 Votes
      17 Posts
      1k Views
      DonahueD

      no, I am saying that I could see that someone wanted to separate out their devices so each could have its own separate DHCP scope. I am not saying that this was a good idea, or that I would do it, just that I can see how VLAN's could be used to achieve that effect. Again, I am not saying this would be using VLANs correctly

    • scottalanmillerS

      Security Theater Expained

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved security security theater
      3
      3 Votes
      3 Posts
      511 Views
      DonahueD

      haha

    • DonahueD

      Large or small Raid 5 with SSD

      Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
      97
      1 Votes
      97 Posts
      10k Views
      scottalanmillerS

      @Dashrender said in Large or small Raid 5 with SSD:

      @scottalanmiller said in Large or small Raid 5 with SSD:

      @Donahue said in Large or small Raid 5 with SSD:

      @scottalanmiller said in Large or small Raid 5 with SSD:

      @Donahue said in Large or small Raid 5 with SSD:

      @scottalanmiller said in Large or small Raid 5 with SSD:

      @Donahue said in Large or small Raid 5 with SSD:

      $411

      Good for what it is. Still a bit of money.

      I was under the impression that OBR was the way this should be done.

      OBR probably makes sense at $411 to get around it πŸ™‚

      I can’t tell if you are for it or against it, and what β€˜it’ is

      $411 to get around putting everything in an OBR. If non-OBR was "free" we'd prefer it. Extra capacity, extra channels, that sort of thing. But it isn't free, it costs money. If it was $1 or $5, we'd basically always do it. But at $411, that's pretty steep. That is more than buying two SSDs on your own and doing it. So really doesn't make sense when just doing two small SSDs in RAID 1 isn't normally a good idea.

      What enterprise SSDs are you buying where you get two for under $411?

      No value in enterprise SSDs for a RAID 1 boot storage.

    • 1
    • 2
    • 187
    • 188
    • 189
    • 190
    • 191
    • 699
    • 700
    • 189 / 700