@kevin-k said in Anyone start an MVNO?:

@bigbear I have an idea to put your money to work.

he's been gone a long time. Almost a year.

@scottalanmiller said in Estación de trabajo con 10 segundos de atraso en el reloj:

@dbeato said in Estación de trabajo con 10 segundos de atraso en el reloj:

@scottalanmiller said in Estación de trabajo con 10 segundos de atraso en el reloj:

Anyone know what the normal variance on Windows boxes is when not using a local time source? How close in seconds would we even expect a site to be able to be?

You can have it up to 5 minutes from the Domain Controller Servers time.

No DCs. No AD.

Gotcha, I am still trying to see what is the issue. 10 seconds is almost unnoticeable. What is the purpose?

@JaredBusch said in Locally hosted email with CloudFlare Origin cert - SMTP?:

@Dashrender said in Locally hosted email with CloudFlare Origin cert - SMTP?:

@JaredBusch said in Locally hosted email with CloudFlare Origin cert - SMTP?:

@Dashrender said in Locally hosted email with CloudFlare Origin cert - SMTP?:

This is related to my moving to CloudFlare proxy thread.

The issue is - if the email server only has the CF Origin TLS cert, how will SMTP over TLS work? I would assume that other mail servers might reject that cert because it's not signed by a trusted CA.

Does this only affect inbound mail?

I have never actually tested this with Exchange, but I do know that I can tell postfix to send with TLS without configuring any certificates.

Sure, that's not really secure though, it's TLS with no security.

As for what it affects - I frankly don't know. For all I know a self signed cert would be fine - but I don't know what happens when you both a assumed allowable cert and a CF origin cert on the same machine.

Umm I think you misunderstand. When you send, you don't need a cert. Just like you don't need a cert in your browser to access HTTPS pages. the other side has that.

Yes, I assume you need something valid for the inbound SMTP.

OK - yeah, I suppose the receiving side is what sets up the tunnel.. Ok good point...

hello,

I 've had the same issues, and after many attempts and trying most suggestions I 've found online such as uninstall hyper v, remove antivirus, run windows update troubleshooter changing bios settings for virtualisation, and clearing windows>softwaredistribution folder, fixing Windows corruption errors with DISM & SFC tools and restarting bits and windows installer... and nothing seemed to do the trick.. until I thought to try decrypting the C drive i had encrypted with VeraCrypt... and bingo this fixed it for me...

@Dashrender said in Another FreePBX Sangoma Query . . .:

@JaredBusch said in Another FreePBX Sangoma Query . . .:

@Dashrender said in Another FreePBX Sangoma Query . . .:

all they have to do then is pickup the phone and the call would be there.

Without even hitting a button to take the call off of hold? WTF?

What if I need to call someone else first, before taking the call?

OK OK OK - they might have to push a button, but that wasn't the point. Again you're reading to much into it JB.

No, I am being specific. There is a huge difference inthe two actions.

You can set a button to pick up the parked call simply enough.

I have not used it, only provided some guidance in SW for that.

@stacksofplates This looks fantastic. Thanks

@dbeato said in Zimbra 8.8.12 Released:

@scottalanmiller said in Zimbra 8.8.12 Released:

Wow, They release Open Drive and it only works up to NextCloud 13? NextCloud 16 is in RC today. What the heck?

Yeah, that is weird. Behind the times.

My level of impressed keeps slipping.

@IRJ said in How to screen record the session:

@black3dynamite said in How to screen record the session:

@IRJ said in How to screen record the session:

@black3dynamite said in How to screen record the session:

Using the script command can make typescript of terminal session.

https://www.tecmint.com/record-and-replay-linux-terminal-session-commands-using-script/

https://noise.getoto.net/2016/06/14/how-to-record-ssh-sessions-established-through-a-bastion-host/

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/25639/how-to-automatically-record-all-your-terminal-sessions-with-script-utility#25725

User can easily delete though

What about using something like chattr or SELinux to prevent deletion?
https://serverfault.com/questions/448891/how-to-prevent-file-owner-from-changing-deleting-their-own-file-linux-centos

Do you think using auditd would be better?

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/6/html/security_guide/sec-configuring_pam_for_auditing

Looks a lot less complicating to use.

Our go-to solution for VSS problems is to set up a dedicated snapshot volume. Otherwise we were getting timeouts and M$ does ugly things that don't make sense when VSS doesn't work properly.

We use ghost adapters to allow EDID hi res with no head attached, I wonder if there is one that forces 640x480? I'll search around...

74905B6F-0A48-4495-B22B-98F0AC666E19.jpeg
CF0F63DD-CC12-4F71-A1EE-17F4E928B0E5.jpeg
C3BEA56B-8D3D-47CC-8519-793A9F6CF07A.jpeg

@dafyre I uninstalled ITarian from the computer, it took a long time before I could uninstall the app from the phone. It is working fine now

@wirestyle22 said in Nginx Reverse Proxy + SSL + Wordpress:

I'm going to go through the installation steps again and not use lets encrypt this time. I'll try to active the SSL cert with ReallySimpleSSL

Let's Encrypt cannot be a factor. Certbot isn't a factor. ReallySimpleSSL needs you to have a cert, I've always used it with LE.

Don't flail. Keep the LE cert, that can't be related to the problem.

If we were going to give containers a number, it would be more like a Type -1 than a 3. Containers are lighter than Type 1, not heavier than Type 2. Still totally different. But Type 0, 1, 2 go from lighter to heavier.

@smartkid808 said in Veeam Backup & Replication Community Edition:

@JaredBusch my bad. They just posted it on SW couple days ago about it, and the blog on the Veeam site is only 2 days old, didn't realize it was here already

Don't be afraid to repost. Hell I've done it before. I just want all the things cross linked whenever possible. Makes it easier to find details in 6 months.

In this case I even mis-remembered where the fuck I read about it. Thanks @dbeato.

@scottalanmiller said in IT legal resources?:

We have an attorney, but he's not specific to IT.

He does know IT?
Best way to proceed?

Well - on behalf of my customer (and I'm billing them for it) I opened a case through my O365 account about how O365 is assigning BCL 9 to an email from their domain, for seemingly everyone in O365.

After more than an hour on the phone, we left it with me sending MS some headers and a mailtrace.

They did point out some nice tools I thought I would share.

https://sender.office.com

This site allows you to request MS to remove an IP from MS's black lists.

https://testconnectivity.microsoft.com/

This site has a Message Analyzer tab now - at least I never noticed it before. it can analyze headers.

I had a similar issue in a workgroup with drives disconnecting. A bunch of Googling brought me to this.

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/297684/mapped-drive-connection-to-network-share-may-be-lost

That seemed to fix the issue for me.