@fuznutz04 said in KVM networking & teaming:

@DustinB3403 said in KVM networking & teaming:

@fuznutz04 no he's saying you can only assign it in VM or via CLI. You still create your team.

I think he is actually saying, you can create the NIC team in Cockpit. (You can, I did it already), but you then just assign that team, via the VM Guest settings. ...I think.

For what's it's worth, that is what I said.

rothmannc.png

Are you sure it is RockChat now Rocket.Chat?

@FATeknollogee said in Edgerouter experts: UNMS to gui:

@JaredBusch said in Edgerouter experts: UNMS to gui:

No. Why would you want that anyway? You have the terminal already. If you really need the GUI, drop a quick allow in the firewall rules for your current public IP.

I like to have access to the GUI, I thought there was some "backdoor" way through UNMS.
The firewall rule is good enough, thanks.

It provides access to the CLI, but not to the GUI. If you want GUI access in that way, the trick is to make a remote proxy (a la Nginx) and do it that way, no need for UNMS.

Mine home is a tale of 2 worlds. Personal stuff is all games, or things that are automatically backed up to a couple providers. IE: Pictures and videos all go to both Google Photos and Amazon Photos.

My home lab stuff all goes to Wasabi, but I haven't gotten all the kinks worked out with the setup yet. I think it will work just fine, once I make some time to troubleshoot the thing.

@JaredBusch said in Real Costs of VitalPBX:

@scottalanmiller said in Real Costs of VitalPBX:

@JaredBusch said in Real Costs of VitalPBX:

So thanks to @MontesVitalPBX we now know that the commercial addons cost 25% of purchase price for yearly maintenance.

This will let us begin to calculate the real costs of using VitalPBX.

Wow, that's not bad at all. So much cheaper than I would assume most people assume and way cheaper than I was expecting. That should be on the site because that's really good info!

Well it will be. See the other thread.

It is a fair price. It is totally acceptable. My objection was always because it was hidden.

Been chilling all weekend so not even close to caught up yet 🙂

I solved this - problem was, after I changed port on MC2, I needed to download new MeshAgents that are setup for that port and install them to monitored PCs

@JaredBusch Thanks for the link. Good reading!

@JaredBusch I have a couple clients using Synology for their auth needs and it's been working extremely well.

Exported, cleaned up references to mongo and all better. No Mongo.

Export the database (this uses the running database, so I had to have Mongo fixed)

cd /opt/meshcentral node node_modules/meshcentral --dbexport"

Go in the config file and remove the "mongodb" line(s) in settings

nano /opt/meshcentral/meshcentral-data/config.json

Restart meshcentral

systemctl restart meshcentral # or /opt/meshcentral/mcstop /opt/meshcentral/mcstart

Import the database

cd /opt/meshcentral node node_modules/meshcentral --dbimport"

Restart meshcentral

systemctl restart meshcentral # or /opt/meshcentral/mcstop /opt/meshcentral/mcstart

If this is a systemd distro, you can just create a timer and service. That way instead of sending a mail message, it's automatically part of the logging for that unit.

If it's a recent version of systemd, you can have a user based systemd that doesn't need escalated privileges. I just finished setting up borg for backup since I'm on Fedora Silverblue now (couldn't use the old way), and I just set up user based systemd units to do the backup.

@Pete-S said in Checksum verification:

Did the piping example I posted above satisfy your switch requirement even though it isn't a switch?

Or maybe you're looking for something else?

Was busy dealing with the firmware update itself.
Yes. That works simply enough. Still annoyed that they don't have a switch..

@Pete-S said in Service provider - monitoring questions:

Thanks guys for your replies!

I had a feeling that monitoring was "underutilized" compared to what is technically possible. But as always, it's the business needs and the effort (cost) that determines the service level.

totally underutilized compared to what is possible. you are 100% spot on with that.

@scottalanmiller said in FortiGate - Speedtest:

@notverypunny said in FortiGate - Speedtest:

You should be OK with a laptop for these speeds.

A laptop, yes. That's not the point. The issue is something with this particular setup, laptop or whatever, can't get the speeds so testing with it doesn't tell him anything useful.

I've run into issues specifically for laptops where I couldn't get decent speeds, something either with the HW specifically or power-management / network stack wouldn't allow me to get the same speeds as a server / workstation connected to the exact same port / equipment. Regardless, you're correct that this laptop seems to have issues.

Is the package 100MB up and down? Is it a full 100 or a "burstable" setup (not sure how common this one is, but at a former gig we had a line that was provisioned at one speed but would allow temporary surges to another tier before automatically throttling back to the base rate.)

using iperf3
DOWNLOAD SPEEDS

iperf3 -c iperf.he.net -R -P 10

UPLOAD SPEEDS

iperf3 -c iperf.he.net -P 10

You can check a list of public iperf servers :
https://iperf.fr/iperf-servers.php
if you're in another region or if the HE ones are too busy

It really depends. If you don't do software transcoding even hundreds of call on quite low power hardware would be fine (say 2GB ram and 4 CPU cores).

We've found that using a Sangoma E1 card the same hardware would handle the double of the calls, only because Asterisk bases its timing source on the Sangoma hardware instead of using the dummy one.

One test that you can do is to run the command dahdi_test, the values should be not less than 99.996% for a good audio quality, specially for music on hold and conference rooms.

There are some hardware timers that do the same job for a very low price, ie

https://www.thedebugstore.com/asterisk-pbx-system-timer-cards/

@scottalanmiller said in Your Top 5 Azure or O365 tasks:

Number One Task for Us: Creating a New User, Assigning a License, Adding to Groups

Ditto.

You need to setup the EC2 instance with a WAN Dynamic IP (Elastic IP address). Then just go through the Internet gateway and have the security group blocking incoming traffic over the Dynamic IP provided to the EC2 instance.