@travisdh1 Thanks Travis. I was thinking about this last night.
I agree, I'd be better off running up a new instance of W11, installing hyper-V and running a Ubuntu VM as well as my W11 workstation so I can switch between the two.
I've played with Proxmox before, It's a good and easy product to use.
@Obsolesce We have seen it on both situations and it is annoying to be honest for end users.
Yeah I can definitely imagine that being annoying. If ya can't find or fix the the network or config issue, no choice other than to disable it on all the clients.
@dafyre of course. The aliases are email addresses, as the cronjob output needs to be emailed
to a few/several recipients. The script runs fine. I have zero issues with the script. It is just
the email aliases are not expanding ( /etc/aliases) .I am puzzled as it has worked fine for literally years.
Yes, I tried bridge mode. That hadn't worked. But I found the error at least and the bridge between the host and the VMs works now. I can ping the VMs from the host and vice versa, with IP address and domain name.
However, I can only reach the VMs via their local IP address, not via the domains when using a browser.
I think you should first solve the issue why you can't reach your VMs from outside your LAN (I mean before you setup HAproxy).
I would first test, can I reach them via external IP address. (have you tried this?)
If that is OK, then test access via DynDNS domain.
I may have an account I have forgotten about
But I continue to use local only. I believe they call it an “Offline Account”
On my personal Windows laptop, I use my Microsoft account (MFA'd). It makes things all around that way more convenient for me. To avoid passwords, and because I want that separated, I use Windows Hello (fingerprint or PIN). Then BitLocker (TPM 2.0+), and of course the BitLocker Startup PIN.
On my personal Linux laptop, basically the same thing as above, but SW level encryption.
I'm looking forward to trying Ubuntu's TPM-backed Full Disk Encryption soon! I haven't had time yet.
Moving from that port which was only giving 10FDx to an unused port, gave us 1000FDx.
I'm not sure where this issue stems from..
Got it sorted out, for some reason (and I'm still working on the specifics) our ESXi hosts secondary NIC keeps falling to 10FDx (likely some misconfiguration at setup).
I've moved XO off of this nic, and performance has been fixed.
If you want to improve ESXi performance, install KVM.
Yea, that's a different conversation entirely, I do want a outside of the XCP-ng pool environment, in case something goes sideways. I'm dealing with some sunkcost conversations about it, though I am making progress.