ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XenServer Backup

    IT Discussion
    9
    185
    74.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • olivierO
      olivier @stacksofplates
      last edited by

      @johnhooks Depends of your XenServer SR type, not related to XO.

      • LVMoiSCSI: thick provisioned (not for Dundee IIRC)
      • NFS: thin pro
      • Local LVM SR: thick pro
      stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • stacksofplatesS
        stacksofplates @olivier
        last edited by

        @olivier said:

        @johnhooks Depends of your XenServer SR type, not related to XO.

        • LVMoiSCSI: thick provisioned (not for Dundee IIRC)
        • NFS: thin pro
        • Local LVM SR: thick pro

        Ok so it could potentially be the full size. I just wondered because if you don't have a ton of space you would need to make sure you have enough for the backups to keep those delta drives.

        Like if you've got 400GB of space and have a 300GB VM that's nearly full, you might not be able to do the delta backup since it needs to keep that extra 300GB drive. Does that sound correct?

        olivierO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • olivierO
          olivier @stacksofplates
          last edited by

          @johnhooks Sadly yes. That's the usual problem with thick pro storage. That's why NFS is always a good idea for shared SR.

          I have to make some test to check how Dundee behave now with Local LVM and LVMoiSCSI.

          stacksofplatesS scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • stacksofplatesS
            stacksofplates @olivier
            last edited by

            @olivier said:

            @johnhooks Sadly yes. That's the usual problem with thick pro storage. That's why NFS is always a good idea for shared SR.

            I have to make some test to check how Dundee behave now with Local LVM and LVMoiSCSI.

            Ok, I just wanted to make sure. Thanks again!!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • olivierO
              olivier
              last edited by

              You are welcome. Now it's more calm here, just take a preview (draft article, not published yet) about what's coming very soon: https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/p/82d8aaf1-84be-4a81-ab3a-10891bf7d1bb/

              stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
              • stacksofplatesS
                stacksofplates @olivier
                last edited by

                @olivier said:

                You are welcome. Now it's more calm here, just take a preview (draft article, not published yet) about what's coming very soon: https://xen-orchestra.com/blog/p/82d8aaf1-84be-4a81-ab3a-10891bf7d1bb/

                That's awesome!!

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @olivier
                  last edited by

                  @olivier said:

                  @johnhooks Sadly yes. That's the usual problem with thick pro storage. That's why NFS is always a good idea for shared SR.

                  Even VMware recommends NFS when it is available.

                  DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403 @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller But wouldn't that effectively build an IPOD?

                    Even if you have the best possible NFS solution (in reality)?

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      @DustinB3403 said:

                      @scottalanmiller But wouldn't that effectively build an IPOD?

                      Even if you have the best possible NFS solution (in reality)?

                      No, NFS is no more or less unable to be "unIPODed" than any other connection technology. You just build highly reliable storage. We did NFS on SAM-SD HA for a major medical group in Texas over like 30 miles. NFS can be clustered just like anything else.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403
                        last edited by

                        I'm making a new topic as I want to pick your brain on this in the SMB space.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          @DustinB3403 said:

                          I'm making a new topic as I want to pick your brain on this in the SMB space.

                          Okay

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 6
                          • 7
                          • 8
                          • 9
                          • 10
                          • 10 / 10
                          • First post
                            Last post