CloudatCon aka CloudatCost
-
I am confused at the last response made by @rivalsurvival that he instantly deleted
-
I see he deleted that made up answer since it was so impossible. Anyone who has used CloudatCost or has been in this community knows that MineCraft can't be run on it, it lacks the horsepower.
-
Spice Work? I was never active on that since there is no down vote. I run a part time minecraft server on these clouds so i don't always need to keep it on. I;m still fairly new to linux so this is like a testing ground for me and i like it.
-
@IRJ said:
I am confused at the last response made by @rivalsurvival that he instantly deleted
He was trying to say that he uses CloudatCost for MineCraft - but apparently never actually logs in. Which explains why he thinks that it might be working.
-
For some reason i can't see the text that i posted so i decided to retype it without quoting anybody.
-
@rivalsurvival said:
Spice Work? I was never active on that since there is no down vote.
We knew that your account was moderated this morning. And there IS a down vote. Had you been on there, you would have been aware.
-
@rivalsurvival said:
For some reason i can't see the text that i posted so i decided to retype it without quoting anybody.
The quote doesn't work properly. It is there but you have to click to expand it.
When you respond to a quote, you need to not reply IN the quote, but below it.
-
I have never taken great care into spicework. I have only heard that there is no down vote so i assumed that there is no downvote. Apprantly i am wrong.
EDIT: My account didn't get moderated?! I can still log in with facebook like i usually do when i am on spicework. -
@rivalsurvival said:
I have never taken great care into spicework. I have only heard that there is no down vote so i assumed that there is no downvote. Apprantly i am wrong.
You just put your mouse on the "Spice Up" button and if you have not spiced something up, it gives you the option to spice it down.
-
Cant quote exactly cause it was deleted but
-
@Sparkum said:
Cant quote exactly cause it was deleted but
He had multiple post all on C@C stuff stating how good of a service it was. and they were backed by Fibernetics etc.
-
Really guys now? For one thing, I am not a cloudatcost employee, just a customer happy that his server is still functioning. I've only joined mangolassi less than 30 minutes agon because i saw your thread here and wanted to join the discussion. Sure, we all know that their support is bad and that's true, i am still angry at them for messing up the entire server once because of a "maintaince" on my server. Turned out they bricked my server and just told me to re-image. Lost all of my work and they DIDN"T even say a single sorry about that. I hate and like them just as much as you guys do.
-
While this is certainly entertaining why is C@C still wasting their time on ML trying to save face with a few rather than doing serious PR on twitter?
-
@IRJ said:
While this is certainly entertaining why is C@C still wasting their time on ML trying to save face with a few rather than doing serious PR on twitter?
Trying what they can. It's non-recoverable at this point.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@IRJ said:
While this is certainly entertaining why is C@C still wasting their time on ML trying to save face with a few rather than doing serious PR on twitter?
Trying what they can. It's non-recoverable at this point.
They may be able to save some face on twitter, but it should be obvious that ML is done
-
"Backed by Fibernetics", the ISP so bad that even CloudatCost doesn't use them, and they are the same company!!
-
I can't believe that CloudatCost not using Fibernetics for their ISP isn't a bigger deal.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
I can't believe that CloudatCost not using Fibernetics for their ISP isn't a bigger deal.
Funny thing is the ISP isn't even called Fibernetics. It's called NEWT and Worldline.
-
@Danp said:
Wow... my server has finally moved on to the "reimaging" process. Maybe that will be done in another 3.5 hours.
Impressive.... NOT!
Build finally finished. Unfortunately, I have no way to verify how long it actually took. Seems they log deletions, but not creation / imaging requests.
-
I still wonder why they are using TLS 1.0 and RC4 cipher for the SSL on the panel (and other parts of the site). It's old and has known vulnerabilities.
